LTL vs. UYM

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LTL (ProShares Ultra Telecommunications) and UYM (ProShares Ultra Basic Materials) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - LTL tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%) while UYM tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LTL returned 8.83%/yr vs 12.48%/yr for UYM. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

LTL vs. UYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than UYM's 27.95% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed UYM with an annualized return of 8.83%, while UYM has yielded a comparatively higher 12.48% annualized return.

LTL

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -9.73%
• YTD: -12.79%
• 6M: -10.48%
• 1Y: 12.42%
• 3Y*: 34.49%
• 5Y*: 15.81%
• 10Y*: 8.83%

UYM

• 1D: 3.74%
• 1M: 1.10%
• YTD: 27.95%
• 6M: 30.38%
• 1Y: 36.06%
• 3Y*: 11.85%
• 5Y*: 4.60%
• 10Y*: 12.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. UYM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	-12.79%	37.06%	65.15%	62.03%	-41.14%	40.42%	-3.25%	30.16%	-23.44%	-26.85%
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	27.95%	9.46%	-8.00%	17.47%	-23.10%	54.58%	16.56%	35.09%	-35.68%	51.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and UYM is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.35
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008	0.49

The correlation between LTL and UYM shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LTL vs. UYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LTL	UYM
Communication Services	57.5%	-
Technology	2.8%	-
Basic Materials	-	87.6%
Consumer Cyclical	-	12.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LTL vs. UYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL

LTL Risk / Return Rank: 16
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 16
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 15
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 16

UYM

UYM Risk / Return Rank: 29
UYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
UYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
UYM Omega Ratio Rank: 28
UYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 31
UYM Martin Ratio Rank: 29

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. UYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTL	UYM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	0.94	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.72	1.47	-0.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	1.17	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.46	1.38	-0.91
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.29	3.67	-2.38

LTL vs. UYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the UYM Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and UYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTL vs. UYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, smaller than the maximum UYM drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and UYM.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTL	UYM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.20%	-92.77%	+12.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.43%	-23.85%	+2.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.37%	-43.88%	+9.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.60%	-48.25%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.15%	-73.31%	+9.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-15.86%	-7.32%	-8.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.63%	-42.06%	+13.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.69%	8.95%	-1.26%

Volatility

LTL vs. UYM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 7.29%, while ProShares Ultra Basic Materials (UYM) has a volatility of 14.01%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTL	UYM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.29%	14.01%	-6.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.50%	27.29%	-7.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.89%	35.09%	-8.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.58%	39.49%	-4.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.91%	42.86%	-5.95%

LTL vs. UYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTL and UYM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

LTL vs. UYM - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than UYM's 1.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	0.93%	0.64%	0.29%	0.97%	2.01%	1.14%	1.57%	0.83%	1.99%	1.96%	0.70%	1.55%
UYM ProShares Ultra Basic Materials	1.19%	1.47%	0.98%	0.28%	0.88%	0.52%	0.56%	1.24%	0.94%	0.38%	0.55%	0.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTL and UYM in my portfolio?

LTL and UYM have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTL or UYM?

UYM has higher volatility (14.01%) compared to LTL (7.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs UYM's -92.77%.

Which ETF is better, LTL or UYM?

On 10-year performance, UYM leads with 12.48% vs 8.83% for LTL. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, LTL has been the lower-risk option at 7.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTL or UYM?

Over the 10-year period, UYM has performed better with a 12.48% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTL or UYM?

LTL and UYM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTL or UYM?

UYM has the higher dividend yield at 1.19%, compared with 0.93% for LTL.

What is the main difference between LTL and UYM?

LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while UYM tracks Dow Jones U.S. Basic Materials Index (200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.94 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.