PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LTL vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LTL vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-12.80%37.06%-1.54%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
18.59%558.51%-40.10%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -12.80% return, which is significantly lower than MULL's 18.59% return.


LTL

1D
5.34%
1M
-12.00%
YTD
-12.80%
6M
-14.87%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
42.86%
5Y*
17.66%
10Y*
9.01%

MULL

1D
9.98%
1M
-37.16%
YTD
18.59%
6M
194.62%
1Y
734.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LTL vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MULL's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LTLMULLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.60

5.72

-5.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.09

3.60

-2.50

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.48

-0.33

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.09

13.35

-12.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.33

37.78

-34.44

LTL vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.60, which is lower than the MULL Sharpe Ratio of 5.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and MULL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LTLMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

5.72

-5.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.62

-1.47

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and MULL is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

LTL vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, more than MULL's 0.33% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.93%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%
MULL
GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF
0.33%0.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

LTL vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than MULL's maximum drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and MULL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-72.29%

-7.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.91%

-53.09%

+31.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.87%

-48.41%

+32.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.85%

-21.94%

-6.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.19%

18.76%

-11.57%

Volatility

LTL vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) is 10.36%, while GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL) has a volatility of 47.04%. This indicates that LTL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MULL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LTLMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.36%

47.04%

-36.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.71%

98.50%

-78.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.87%

129.87%

-93.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.53%

129.40%

-94.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

37.06%

129.40%

-92.34%