PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTL vs. IAI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LTL vs. IAI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -12.79% return, which is significantly lower than IAI's 3.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LTL has underperformed IAI with an annualized return of 8.83%, while IAI has yielded a comparatively higher 19.37% annualized return.


LTL

1D
-1.02%
1M
-9.73%
YTD
-12.79%
6M
-10.48%
1Y
12.42%
3Y*
34.49%
5Y*
15.81%
10Y*
8.83%

IAI

1D
1.83%
1M
2.57%
YTD
3.17%
6M
2.78%
1Y
21.00%
3Y*
28.06%
5Y*
14.44%
10Y*
19.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. IAI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
-12.79%37.06%65.15%62.03%-41.14%40.42%-3.25%30.16%-23.44%-26.85%
IAI
iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF
3.17%25.80%34.37%15.27%-10.87%40.48%18.61%24.26%-9.47%28.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and IAI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.52

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2008

0.50

The correlation between LTL and IAI shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LTL vs. IAI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LTL
IAI

Communication Services

57.5%

-

Technology

2.8%
0.1%

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

99.9%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

LTL
57.5%
IAI

-

Technology

LTL
2.8%
IAI
0.1%

Basic Materials

LTL

-

IAI

-

Consumer Cyclical

LTL

-

IAI

-

Consumer Defensive

LTL

-

IAI

-

Energy

LTL

-

IAI

-

Financial Services

LTL

-

IAI
99.9%

Healthcare

LTL

-

IAI

-

Industrials

LTL

-

IAI

-

Real Estate

LTL

-

IAI

-

Utilities

LTL

-

IAI

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTL vs. IAI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL
LTL Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

IAI
IAI Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAI Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
IAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAI Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. IAI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTLIAIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.18

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.46

1.17

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.29

3.33

-2.04

LTL vs. IAI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the IAI Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and IAI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTL vs. IAI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, which is greater than IAI's maximum drawdown of -75.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and IAI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTLIAIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.20%

-75.46%

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.43%

-16.52%

-4.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.37%

-23.14%

-11.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

-28.84%

-23.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.15%

-40.38%

-23.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.86%

-2.81%

-13.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.63%

-22.63%

-6.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.69%

5.80%

+1.89%

Volatility

LTL vs. IAI - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) has a higher volatility of 7.29% compared to iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF (IAI) at 5.98%. This indicates that LTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTLIAIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.29%

5.98%

+1.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.50%

15.34%

+4.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.89%

19.44%

+7.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.58%

21.48%

+13.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.91%

22.85%

+14.06%

LTL vs. IAI - Expense Ratio Comparison

LTL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IAI's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

LTL vs. IAI - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than IAI's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IAI
iShares U.S. Broker-Dealers & Securities Exchanges ETF
1.05%0.95%1.05%1.80%2.14%1.31%1.55%1.52%1.58%1.37%1.49%1.31%
LTL
ProShares Ultra Telecommunications
0.93%0.64%0.29%0.97%2.01%1.14%1.57%0.83%1.99%1.96%0.70%1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


LTL and IAI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTL has higher volatility (7.29%) compared to IAI (5.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs IAI's -75.46%.

On 10-year performance, IAI leads with 19.37% vs 8.83% for LTL. On fees, IAI is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, IAI has been the lower-risk option at 5.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IAI has performed better with a 19.37% return vs 8.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IAI is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for LTL.

IAI has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.93% for LTL.

LTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IAI is Financials Equities. LTL tracks Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while IAI tracks DJ US Select / Investment Services. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for LTL and 0.41% for IAI.

IAI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTL and IAI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer