LTL vs. BITO

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

LTL (ProShares Ultra Telecommunications) and BITO (ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LTL is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Select Telecommunications Index (200%), while BITO is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by ProShares. LTL is passively managed, while BITO is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, LTL returned 31.49%/yr vs 21.06%/yr for BITO. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

LTL vs. BITO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTL achieves a -11.55% return, which is significantly higher than BITO's -27.77% return.

LTL

• 1D: -1.43%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: -8.64%
• YTD: -11.55%
• 1Y: 6.08%
• 3Y*: 31.49%
• 5Y*: 17.00%
• 10Y*: 6.77%

BITO

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -2.11%
• 6M: -33.51%
• YTD: -27.77%
• 1Y: -48.16%
• 3Y*: 21.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTL vs. BITO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	-11.55%	37.06%	65.15%	62.03%	-41.14%	17.84%
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	-27.77%	-11.19%	104.45%	137.33%	-63.91%	-29.31%

Correlation

The correlation between LTL and BITO is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2021	0.35

Return for Risk

LTL vs. BITO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTL

LTL Risk / Return Rank: 13
LTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
LTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
LTL Omega Ratio Rank: 13
LTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LTL Martin Ratio Rank: 13

BITO

BITO Risk / Return Rank: 1
BITO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Omega Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
BITO Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTL vs. BITO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) and ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LTL	BITO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	-1.10	+1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.51	-1.70	+2.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	0.81	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.25	-0.89	+1.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.64	-1.42	+2.06

LTL vs. BITO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTL Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the BITO Sharpe Ratio of -1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTL and BITO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LTL vs. BITO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTL drawdown since its inception was -80.20%, roughly equal to the maximum BITO drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTL and BITO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTL	BITO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.20%	-77.86%	-2.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.33%	-54.47%	+30.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.37%	-54.47%	+20.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-52.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.66%	-50.18%	+35.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.58%	-37.06%	+8.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.47%	33.91%	-24.44%

Volatility

LTL vs. BITO - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Telecommunications (LTL) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) at 10.49%. This indicates that LTL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BITO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTL	BITO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.68%	10.49%	+1.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.20%	34.48%	-12.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.99%	44.10%	-16.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	34.86%	54.80%	-19.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.88%	54.80%	-17.92%

LTL vs. BITO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LTL and BITO have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

LTL vs. BITO - Dividend Comparison

LTL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.97%, less than BITO's 60.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BITO ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF	60.24%	78.29%	61.59%	15.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTL ProShares Ultra Telecommunications	0.97%	0.64%	0.29%	0.97%	2.01%	1.14%	1.57%	0.83%	1.99%	1.96%	0.70%	1.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LTL and BITO in my portfolio?

LTL and BITO have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LTL or BITO?

LTL has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to BITO (10.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTL dropped -80.20% vs BITO's -77.86%.

Which ETF is better, LTL or BITO?

On 3-year performance, LTL leads with 31.49% vs 21.06% for BITO. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, BITO has been the lower-risk option at 10.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LTL or BITO?

Over the 3-year period, LTL has performed better with a 31.49% return vs 21.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LTL or BITO?

LTL and BITO have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LTL or BITO?

BITO has the higher dividend yield at 60.24%, compared with 0.97% for LTL.

What is the main difference between LTL and BITO?

LTL is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BITO is Cryptocurrency.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.