LTINX vs. FRAMX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX).
LTINX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Feb 28, 2008. FRAMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Aug 30, 2007.
Performance
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | -1.95% | 10.61% | 10.67% | 11.15% | -13.61% | 7.41% | 11.87% | 16.32% | -4.72% | 13.19% |
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | -0.57% | 9.55% | 4.04% | 7.80% | -11.87% | 2.52% | 8.30% | 10.28% | -2.05% | 6.82% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTINX achieves a -1.95% return, which is significantly lower than FRAMX's -0.57% return. Over the past 10 years, LTINX has outperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 6.13%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.65% annualized return.
LTINX
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- -1.95%
- 6M
- -0.65%
- 1Y
- 7.16%
- 3Y*
- 8.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 6.13%
FRAMX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- -0.57%
- 6M
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 5.66%
- 5Y*
- 2.13%
- 10Y*
- 3.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LTINX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LTINX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank
LTINX
FRAMX
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LTINX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.13 | 1.50 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.59 | 2.09 | -0.50 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.30 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 2.00 | -0.61 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.10 | 8.06 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LTINX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.13 | 1.50 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 | 0.41 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.82 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.49 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between LTINX and FRAMX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison
LTINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.14%, more than FRAMX's 2.91% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTINX Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund | 12.14% | 11.91% | 10.80% | 4.75% | 7.98% | 8.21% | 5.51% | 12.76% | 9.62% | 7.62% | 3.63% | 8.86% |
FRAMX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A | 2.91% | 2.77% | 2.77% | 2.58% | 4.26% | 3.31% | 2.23% | 2.37% | 4.40% | 8.26% | 1.42% | 1.42% |
Drawdowns
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTINX drawdown since its inception was -44.03%, which is greater than FRAMX's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTINX and FRAMX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTINX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.03% | -33.94% | -10.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.98% | -3.45% | -1.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.54% | -16.31% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.54% | -16.31% | -2.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.17% | -3.20% | -0.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.22% | -3.87% | -1.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.13% | 0.86% | +0.27% |
Volatility
LTINX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison
Principal LifeTime 2015 Fund (LTINX) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.96%. This indicates that LTINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LTINX | FRAMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 1.96% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.82% | 2.86% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.51% | 4.59% | +1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.31% | 5.21% | +2.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.31% | 4.47% | +2.84% |