LTH vs. EL

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL).

Performance

LTH vs. EL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LTH vs. EL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LTH Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.	1.35%	20.16%	46.68%	26.09%	-30.51%	-3.04%
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.	-31.25%	42.13%	-47.59%	-40.13%	-32.31%	17.81%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LTH : $6.11B EL : $26.18B
EPS LTH : $1.65 EL : -$0.49
PS Ratio LTH : 2.03 EL : 1.78
PB Ratio LTH : 1.95 EL : 6.50
Total Revenue (TTM) LTH : $3.00B EL : $14.67B
Gross Profit (TTM) LTH : $2.66B EL : $10.91B
EBITDA (TTM) LTH : $799.78M EL : $1.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTH achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than EL's -31.25% return.

LTH

• 1D: 3.30%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: -10.79%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EL

• 1D: 5.58%
• 1M: -34.44%
• YTD: -31.25%
• 6M: -17.99%
• 1Y: 10.48%
• 3Y*: -32.48%
• 5Y*: -23.38%
• 10Y*: -1.58%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LTH vs. EL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTH

LTH Risk / Return Rank: 28
LTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
LTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LTH Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LTH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

EL

EL Risk / Return Rank: 49
EL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EL Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
EL Omega Ratio Rank: 47
EL Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
EL Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTH vs. EL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTH	EL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	0.20	-0.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	0.61	-0.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.09	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	0.26	-0.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	0.96	-1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTH vs. EL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the EL Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTH and EL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTH	EL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	0.20	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.26	-0.05

Correlation

The correlation between LTH and EL is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LTH vs. EL - Dividend Comparison

LTH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LTH Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EL The Estee Lauder Companies Inc.	1.95%	1.34%	3.11%	1.81%	0.99%	0.59%	0.56%	0.86%	1.21%	1.10%	1.62%	1.16%

Drawdowns

LTH vs. EL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTH drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, smaller than the maximum EL drawdown of -85.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTH and EL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTH	EL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.36%	-85.82%	+27.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.42%	-43.62%	+18.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-85.82%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-85.82%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.93%	-79.34%	+60.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.41%	-20.37%	-2.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.97%	11.94%	+4.03%

Volatility

LTH vs. EL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) is 10.64%, while The Estee Lauder Companies Inc. (EL) has a volatility of 18.48%. This indicates that LTH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTH	EL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.64%	18.48%	-7.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.37%	38.24%	-14.87%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.75%	51.92%	-14.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.33%	42.69%	+4.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.33%	36.11%	+11.22%

Financials