LTH vs. PBI
LTH (Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.) and PBI (Pitney Bowes Inc.) are both stocks. LTH operates in Leisure (Consumer Cyclical), while PBI operates in Integrated Freight & Logistics (Industrials). Over the past 3 years, LTH returned 25.25%/yr vs 79.70%/yr for PBI. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LTH vs. PBI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LTH achieves a 40.44% return, which is significantly lower than PBI's 64.56% return.
LTH
- 1D
- 1.11%
- 1M
- 16.40%
- YTD
- 40.44%
- 6M
- 38.67%
- 1Y
- 31.58%
- 3Y*
- 25.25%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PBI
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 12.39%
- YTD
- 64.56%
- 6M
- 63.63%
- 1Y
- 72.73%
- 3Y*
- 79.70%
- 5Y*
- 19.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.83%
LTH vs. PBI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTH Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. | 40.44% | 20.16% | 46.68% | 26.09% | -30.51% | 3.86% |
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc. | 64.56% | 50.42% | 70.63% | 22.24% | -39.71% | -6.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between LTH and PBI is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021 | 0.35 |
The correlation between LTH and PBI shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LTH:
$1.70
PBI:
$1.29
LTH:
21.92
PBI:
13.30
LTH:
0.26
PBI:
0.05
LTH:
2.75
PBI:
1.19
LTH:
$3.08B
PBI:
$1.88B
LTH:
$3.02B
PBI:
$1.03B
LTH:
$864.89M
PBI:
$386.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LTH vs. PBI — Risk / Return Rank
LTH
PBI
LTH vs. PBI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LTH | PBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.34 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 2.58 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.10 | 5.48 | -2.37 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LTH vs. PBI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LTH drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, smaller than the maximum PBI drawdown of -93.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTH and PBI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LTH | PBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.36% | -93.07% | +34.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.24% | -28.28% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.10% | -28.28% | -20.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -74.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -88.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -17.23% | +17.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.73% | -32.88% | +11.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.20% | 13.32% | -3.12% |
Volatility
LTH vs. PBI - Volatility Comparison
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Pitney Bowes Inc. (PBI) at 7.23%. This indicates that LTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PBI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LTH | PBI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.15% | 7.23% | +4.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.01% | 25.58% | +4.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.58% | 37.71% | +0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 51.94% | -4.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.69% | 64.98% | -17.29% |
Dividends
LTH vs. PBI - Dividend Comparison
LTH has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.10%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LTH Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PBI Pitney Bowes Inc. | 2.10% | 2.84% | 2.76% | 4.55% | 5.26% | 3.02% | 3.25% | 4.96% | 12.69% | 6.71% | 4.94% | 3.63% |
Financials
LTH vs. PBI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. and Pitney Bowes Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LTH vs. PBI - Profitability Comparison
LTH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 698.81M and revenue of 788.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.6%.
PBI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pitney Bowes Inc. reported a gross profit of 272.58M and revenue of 477.41M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.1%.
LTH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 134.84M and revenue of 788.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.
PBI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pitney Bowes Inc. reported an operating income of 80.47M and revenue of 477.41M, resulting in an operating margin of 16.9%.
LTH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 88.10M and revenue of 788.70M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.
PBI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Pitney Bowes Inc. reported a net income of 58.14M and revenue of 477.41M, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LTH and PBI have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LTH has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to PBI (7.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTH dropped -58.36% vs PBI's -93.07%.
PBI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LTH and PBI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer