PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LTH vs. PLNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LTH vs. PLNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTH achieves a 40.44% return, which is significantly higher than PLNT's -52.93% return.


LTH

1D
1.11%
1M
16.40%
YTD
40.44%
6M
38.67%
1Y
31.58%
3Y*
25.25%
5Y*
10Y*

PLNT

1D
-3.62%
1M
-1.90%
YTD
-52.93%
6M
-54.16%
1Y
-52.39%
3Y*
-8.06%
5Y*
-8.10%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LTH vs. PLNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
40.44%20.16%46.68%26.09%-30.51%3.86%
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
-52.93%9.71%35.44%-7.36%-13.01%13.13%

Correlation

The correlation between LTH and PLNT is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2021

0.51

The correlation between LTH and PLNT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LTH:

$8.49B

PLNT:

$4.07B

EPS

LTH:

$1.70

PLNT:

$2.76

PE Ratio

LTH:

21.92

PLNT:

18.49

PEG Ratio

LTH:

0.26

PLNT:

0.33

PS Ratio

LTH:

2.75

PLNT:

3.06

Total Revenue (TTM)

LTH:

$3.08B

PLNT:

$1.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LTH:

$3.02B

PLNT:

$749.98M

EBITDA (TTM)

LTH:

$864.89M

PLNT:

$526.17M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LTH vs. PLNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTH
LTH Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTH Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
LTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

PLNT
PLNT Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
PLNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLNT Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PLNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLNT Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTH vs. PLNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LTHPLNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

0.74

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

-0.86

+2.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

-1.97

+5.07

LTH vs. PLNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTH Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is higher than the PLNT Sharpe Ratio of -1.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTH and PLNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LTH vs. PLNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTH drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, smaller than the maximum PLNT drawdown of -68.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTH and PLNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LTHPLNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.36%

-68.72%

+10.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.24%

-61.24%

+42.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.10%

-61.24%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-55.03%

+55.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.73%

-15.28%

-6.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.20%

26.64%

-16.44%

Volatility

LTH vs. PLNT - Volatility Comparison

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) has a higher volatility of 12.15% compared to Planet Fitness, Inc. (PLNT) at 9.34%. This indicates that LTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LTHPLNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.15%

9.34%

+2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.01%

44.55%

-14.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.58%

45.31%

-6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

47.69%

38.70%

+8.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.69%

43.59%

+4.10%

Dividends

LTH vs. PLNT - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTH nor PLNT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
LTH
Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLNT
Planet Fitness, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%13.83%

Financials

LTH vs. PLNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. and Planet Fitness, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
788.70M
337.24M
(LTH) Total Revenue
(PLNT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LTH vs. PLNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. and Planet Fitness, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
88.6%
86.6%
Portfolio components
LTH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 698.81M and revenue of 788.70M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 88.6%.

PLNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a gross profit of 291.90M and revenue of 337.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.6%.

LTH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 134.84M and revenue of 788.70M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

PLNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported an operating income of 98.67M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.3%.

LTH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 88.10M and revenue of 788.70M, resulting in a net margin of 11.2%.

PLNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Planet Fitness, Inc. reported a net income of 51.55M and revenue of 337.24M, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LTH and PLNT have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LTH has higher volatility (12.15%) compared to PLNT (9.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LTH dropped -58.36% vs PLNT's -68.72%.

LTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LTH and PLNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer