LTH vs. CFLT

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT).

Performance

LTH vs. CFLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LTH vs. CFLT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
LTH Life Time Group Holdings, Inc.	1.35%	20.16%	46.68%	26.09%	-30.51%	-3.04%
CFLT Confluent, Inc.	2.48%	8.15%	19.49%	5.22%	-70.83%	13.49%

Fundamentals

Market Cap LTH : $6.11B CFLT : $10.90B
EPS LTH : $1.65 CFLT : -$0.85
PS Ratio LTH : 2.03 CFLT : 9.20
PB Ratio LTH : 1.95 CFLT : 9.33
Total Revenue (TTM) LTH : $3.00B CFLT : $1.17B
Gross Profit (TTM) LTH : $2.66B CFLT : $866.84M
EBITDA (TTM) LTH : $799.78M CFLT : -$339.97M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LTH achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than CFLT's 2.48% return.

LTH

• 1D: 3.30%
• 1M: -0.22%
• YTD: 1.35%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: -10.79%
• 3Y*: 19.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CFLT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 2.48%
• 6M: 56.52%
• 1Y: 32.21%
• 3Y*: 12.30%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LTH vs. CFLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LTH

LTH Risk / Return Rank: 28
LTH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
LTH Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
LTH Omega Ratio Rank: 27
LTH Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
LTH Martin Ratio Rank: 30

CFLT

CFLT Risk / Return Rank: 53
CFLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
CFLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
CFLT Omega Ratio Rank: 59
CFLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
CFLT Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LTH vs. CFLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) and Confluent, Inc. (CFLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LTH	CFLT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.29	0.22	-0.51
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.16	0.76	-0.92
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.98	1.15	-0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	0.42	-0.88
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	0.97	-1.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LTH vs. CFLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LTH Sharpe Ratio is -0.29, which is lower than the CFLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LTH and CFLT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LTH	CFLT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.29	0.22	-0.51
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	-0.10	+0.31

Correlation

The correlation between LTH and CFLT is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

LTH vs. CFLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither LTH nor CFLT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LTH vs. CFLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LTH drawdown since its inception was -58.36%, smaller than the maximum CFLT drawdown of -83.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LTH and CFLT.

Drawdown Indicators

	LTH	CFLT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.36%	-83.00%	+24.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.42%	-41.83%	+16.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.93%	-66.89%	+47.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.41%	-64.03%	+41.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.97%	18.06%	-2.09%

Volatility

LTH vs. CFLT - Volatility Comparison

Life Time Group Holdings, Inc. (LTH) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to Confluent, Inc. (CFLT) at 1.22%. This indicates that LTH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LTH	CFLT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.64%	1.22%	+9.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	23.37%	33.33%	-9.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.75%	63.54%	-25.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.33%	76.23%	-28.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	47.33%	76.23%	-28.90%

Financials