PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSHIX vs. LSSCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHIX achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly lower than LSSCX's 20.28% return. Over the past 10 years, LSHIX has underperformed LSSCX with an annualized return of 4.93%, while LSSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.82% annualized return.


LSHIX

1D
0.17%
1M
-0.17%
6M
1.21%
YTD
2.10%
1Y
5.99%
3Y*
8.49%
5Y*
3.73%
10Y*
4.93%
ALL TIME*
5.69%

LSSCX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.12%
6M
12.59%
YTD
20.28%
1Y
24.55%
3Y*
13.18%
5Y*
9.67%
10Y*
9.82%
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
2.10%9.25%9.43%10.00%-11.68%8.23%3.46%10.55%-3.55%8.41%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
20.28%5.31%10.89%19.39%-11.52%29.03%2.29%25.06%-16.81%10.01%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHIX and LSSCX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.59

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.61

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 1996

0.53

The correlation between LSHIX and LSSCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSHIX vs. LSSCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSHIX
LSHIX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
LSHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

LSSCX
LSSCX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
LSSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LSSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSHIXLSSCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.28

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.01

2.85

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.05

8.90

+5.15

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the LSSCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHIX and LSSCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.26%, smaller than the maximum LSSCX drawdown of -54.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHIX and LSSCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSHIXLSSCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.26%

-54.28%

+14.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

-9.89%

+7.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-25.10%

+20.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-25.10%

+9.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.13%

-44.65%

+20.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-1.67%

+1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.24%

-7.55%

+0.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

2.97%

-2.52%

Volatility

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) is 0.63%, while Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund (LSSCX) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that LSHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSHIXLSSCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

3.31%

-2.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.49%

11.78%

-9.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.35%

17.19%

-13.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.40%

20.78%

-15.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.06%

22.34%

-16.28%

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is lower than LSSCX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSHIX vs. LSSCX - Dividend Comparison

LSHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, less than LSSCX's 14.55% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
5.65%5.77%7.72%6.28%4.96%6.09%5.14%6.75%7.52%5.97%6.06%10.99%
LSSCX
Loomis Sayles Small Cap Value Fund
14.55%17.50%10.71%20.30%12.74%19.01%8.04%8.65%17.43%12.58%8.27%11.35%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSHIX and LSSCX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSSCX has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to LSHIX (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHIX dropped -40.26% vs LSSCX's -54.28%.

LSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSHIX and LSSCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer