PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSHIX vs. LSGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSHIX achieves a 2.10% return, which is significantly higher than LSGSX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, LSHIX has outperformed LSGSX with an annualized return of 5.29%, while LSGSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.


LSHIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.52%
YTD
2.10%
6M
2.28%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
9.16%
5Y*
4.02%
10Y*
5.29%

LSGSX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.41%
YTD
0.73%
6M
0.83%
1Y
2.81%
3Y*
3.25%
5Y*
0.44%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
2.10%9.25%9.43%10.00%-11.68%8.23%3.46%10.55%-3.55%8.41%
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
0.73%5.66%1.80%3.63%-12.50%5.01%13.97%8.63%-2.23%3.61%

Correlation

The correlation between LSHIX and LSGSX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 1996

0.13

Over the past year, LSHIX and LSGSX have become more correlated (0.40) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSHIX vs. LSGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSHIX
LSHIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
LSHIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSHIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSHIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
LSHIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSHIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

LSGSX
LSGSX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
LSGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
LSGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) and Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSHIXLSGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.16

+0.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.17

1.43

+2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.53

3.20

+16.32

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSHIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the LSGSX Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSHIX and LSGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSHIX drawdown since its inception was -40.26%, which is greater than LSGSX's maximum drawdown of -17.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSHIX and LSGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSHIXLSGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.26%

-17.20%

-23.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.25%

-2.34%

+0.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.75%

-4.66%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.18%

-15.23%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.13%

-15.23%

-8.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-2.56%

+2.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.26%

-4.59%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

1.02%

-0.57%

Volatility

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund (LSHIX) is 1.01%, while Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund (LSGSX) has a volatility of 1.12%. This indicates that LSHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSHIXLSGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

1.12%

-0.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.54%

2.48%

+0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

3.81%

-0.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.41%

6.29%

-0.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.13%

5.59%

+0.54%

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSHIX has a 0.71% expense ratio, which is higher than LSGSX's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSHIX vs. LSGSX - Dividend Comparison

LSHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%, more than LSGSX's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSGSX
Loomis Sayles Inflation Protected Securities Fund
2.66%3.53%3.52%3.88%8.23%5.60%0.99%1.96%2.90%2.38%1.48%0.75%
LSHIX
Loomis Sayles Institutional High Income Fund
5.65%5.77%7.72%6.28%4.96%6.09%5.14%6.75%7.52%5.97%6.06%10.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSHIX and LSGSX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSGSX has higher volatility (1.12%) compared to LSHIX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSHIX dropped -40.26% vs LSGSX's -17.20%.

LSHIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSHIX and LSGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer