LSGGX vs. PGVFX
LSGGX (Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund) and PGVFX (Polaris Global Value Fund) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, LSGGX returned 5.09%/yr vs 10.74%/yr for PGVFX. Their 0.62 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. LSGGX charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for PGVFX.
Performance
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSGGX achieves a -8.97% return, which is significantly lower than PGVFX's 20.95% return.
LSGGX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -3.12%
- 6M
- -8.60%
- YTD
- -8.97%
- 1Y
- -5.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 5.09%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 12.26%
PGVFX
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- 6M
- 13.01%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 1Y
- 39.07%
- 3Y*
- 19.16%
- 5Y*
- 10.74%
- 10Y*
- 11.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | -8.97% | 16.84% | 23.30% | 36.10% | -25.98% | 5.89% | 35.25% | 30.63% | -6.70% | 31.11% |
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 20.95% | 27.01% | 5.33% | 14.76% | -12.00% | 15.38% | 6.65% | 22.83% | -12.64% | 20.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSGGX and PGVFX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LSGGX and PGVFX has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSGGX vs. PGVFX — Risk / Return Rank
LSGGX
PGVFX
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSGGX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.96 | 1.55 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 4.21 | -4.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.64 | 15.79 | -16.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSGGX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, smaller than the maximum PGVFX drawdown of -68.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGGX and PGVFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSGGX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.72% | -68.09% | +30.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.08% | -8.76% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.21% | -12.53% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.72% | -27.58% | -10.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.26% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.95% | -0.86% | -13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.69% | -11.24% | +3.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.93% | 2.34% | +6.59% |
Volatility
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) has a higher volatility of 5.35% compared to Polaris Global Value Fund (PGVFX) at 3.42%. This indicates that LSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGVFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSGGX | PGVFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.35% | 3.42% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.55% | 10.71% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.84% | 12.46% | +6.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 13.84% | +8.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.54% | 15.63% | +4.91% |
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSGGX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than PGVFX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSGGX vs. PGVFX - Dividend Comparison
LSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%, less than PGVFX's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund | 0.33% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.77% | 7.38% | 6.15% | 5.74% | 4.78% | 3.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PGVFX Polaris Global Value Fund | 4.28% | 5.17% | 5.65% | 1.68% | 3.55% | 4.05% | 1.55% | 3.69% | 3.39% | 1.50% | 1.32% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSGGX and PGVFX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSGGX has higher volatility (5.35%) compared to PGVFX (3.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSGGX dropped -37.72% vs PGVFX's -68.09%.
PGVFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSGGX and PGVFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer