LSGGX vs. ESGYX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX).

LSGGX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Mar 30, 2016. ESGYX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Mar 30, 2016.

Performance

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	-16.35%	16.84%	23.30%	36.10%	-25.98%	5.89%	35.25%	30.63%	-6.70%	31.11%
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund	-9.28%	15.23%	13.38%	18.63%	-22.36%	18.06%	32.43%	33.00%	-6.37%	29.83%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSGGX achieves a -16.35% return, which is significantly lower than ESGYX's -9.28% return.

LSGGX

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -9.84%
• YTD: -16.35%
• 6M: -18.90%
• 1Y: 1.75%
• 3Y*: 11.82%
• 5Y*: 4.56%
• 10Y*: —

ESGYX

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -9.36%
• YTD: -9.28%
• 6M: -6.61%
• 1Y: 5.48%
• 3Y*: 9.61%
• 5Y*: 4.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LSGGX and ESGYX have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

LSGGX

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund

ESGYX

Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund

Return for Risk

LSGGX vs. ESGYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSGGX

LSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 4
LSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
LSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ESGYX

ESGYX Risk / Return Rank: 11
ESGYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
ESGYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
ESGYX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
ESGYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
ESGYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) and Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSGGX	ESGYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.08	0.31	-0.39
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.06	0.61	-0.56
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.08	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.30	0.12	-0.42
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.84	0.44	-1.29
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSGGX Sharpe Ratio is -0.08, which is lower than the ESGYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSGGX and ESGYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSGGX	ESGYX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08	0.31	-0.39
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.22	0.29	-0.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.58	0.67	-0.09

Correlation

The correlation between LSGGX and ESGYX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Dividend Comparison

LSGGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than ESGYX's 4.89% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LSGGX Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund	0.36%	0.30%	0.00%	0.00%	7.77%	7.38%	6.15%	5.74%	4.78%	3.44%
ESGYX Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund	4.89%	4.44%	1.99%	0.61%	5.28%	12.16%	0.54%	1.84%	4.39%	1.15%

Drawdowns

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSGGX drawdown since its inception was -37.72%, which is greater than ESGYX's maximum drawdown of -34.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSGGX and ESGYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSGGX	ESGYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.72%	-34.88%	-2.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.08%	-11.49%	-9.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.72%	-34.88%	-2.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.92%	-11.36%	-9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.55%	-6.49%	-1.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.93%	4.29%	+3.64%

Volatility

LSGGX vs. ESGYX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Global Growth Fund (LSGGX) has a higher volatility of 5.66% compared to Mirova Global Sustainable Equity Fund (ESGYX) at 3.82%. This indicates that LSGGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESGYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSGGX	ESGYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.66%	3.82%	+1.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.86%	9.61%	+3.25%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.95%	18.15%	+5.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.87%	17.62%	+4.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.57%	17.73%	+2.84%