LSEQ vs. SENT
LSEQ (Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds. LSEQ is actively managed, while SENT is passively managed. Over the past year, LSEQ returned 25.44% vs 0.00% for SENT. LSEQ charges 1.70%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.
Performance
LSEQ vs. SENT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LSEQ
- 1D
- 1.12%
- 1M
- 4.34%
- YTD
- 27.40%
- 6M
- 26.84%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SENT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 0.00%
- 3Y*
- -3.03%
- 5Y*
- -4.51%
- 10Y*
- —
LSEQ vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF | 27.40% | 4.13% | 12.80% | -1.20% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LSEQ vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LSEQ
SENT
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
Basic Materials
LSEQ
SENT
Consumer Cyclical
LSEQ
SENT
Energy
LSEQ
SENT
Healthcare
LSEQ
SENT
Communication Services
LSEQ
SENT
Industrials
LSEQ
SENT
Consumer Defensive
LSEQ
SENT
Utilities
LSEQ
SENT
-
Financial Services
LSEQ
SENT
Real Estate
LSEQ
-
SENT
-
Technology
LSEQ
SENT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSEQ vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank
LSEQ
SENT
LSEQ vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSEQ | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.40 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSEQ | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.19 | -0.25 | +1.44 |
Drawdowns
LSEQ vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and SENT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSEQ | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.35% | -30.34% | +21.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.40% | 0.00% | -7.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -15.83% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.66% | -27.23% | +25.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.23% | -20.90% | +17.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | 0.00% | +2.78% |
Volatility
LSEQ vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that LSEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSEQ | SENT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 0.00% | +5.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.75% | 0.00% | +12.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 0.00% | +15.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 12.66% | +1.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.32% | 13.32% | +1.00% |
LSEQ vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSEQ has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
LSEQ vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison
LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LSEQ Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF | 1.73% | 2.20% |
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LSEQ has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSEQ dropped -8.35% vs SENT's -30.34%.
On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 25.44% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 25.44% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.
LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.
They also come from different issuers: Harbor and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.70% for LSEQ and 1.01% for SENT.
Find the right allocation for LSEQ and SENT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer