PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSEQ vs. SENT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSEQ vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


LSEQ

1D
1.12%
1M
4.34%
YTD
27.40%
6M
26.84%
1Y
25.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SENT

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
0.00%
3Y*
-3.03%
5Y*
-4.51%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSEQ vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LSEQ
Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF
27.40%4.13%12.80%-1.20%
SENT
AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

LSEQ vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
LSEQ
SENT

Basic Materials

27.3%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

17.3%
10.1%

Energy

15.0%
10.3%

Healthcare

14.7%
24.8%

Communication Services

7.0%
1.9%

Industrials

6.5%
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.2%
3.1%

Utilities

3.1%

-

Financial Services

1.2%
6.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-10.9%
26.2%

Basic Materials

LSEQ
27.3%
SENT
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

LSEQ
17.3%
SENT
10.1%

Energy

LSEQ
15.0%
SENT
10.3%

Healthcare

LSEQ
14.7%
SENT
24.8%

Communication Services

LSEQ
7.0%
SENT
1.9%

Industrials

LSEQ
6.5%
SENT
14.6%

Consumer Defensive

LSEQ
5.2%
SENT
3.1%

Utilities

LSEQ
3.1%
SENT

-

Financial Services

LSEQ
1.2%
SENT
6.1%

Real Estate

LSEQ

-

SENT

-

Technology

LSEQ
-10.9%
SENT
26.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSEQ vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSEQ
LSEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
LSEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
LSEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

SENT
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSEQ vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSEQSENTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.40

LSEQ vs. SENT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSEQSENTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.19

-0.25

+1.44

Drawdowns

LSEQ vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.35%, smaller than the maximum SENT drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSEQ and SENT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSEQSENTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.35%

-30.34%

+21.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.40%

0.00%

-7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-27.23%

+25.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.23%

-20.90%

+17.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

0.00%

+2.78%

Volatility

LSEQ vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Long-Short Equity ETF (LSEQ) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that LSEQ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSEQSENTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

0.00%

+5.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.75%

0.00%

+12.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.09%

0.00%

+15.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.32%

12.66%

+1.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.32%

13.32%

+1.00%

LSEQ vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSEQ has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSEQ vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

LSEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


LSEQ has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSEQ dropped -8.35% vs SENT's -30.34%.

On 1-year performance, LSEQ leads with 25.44% vs 0.00% for SENT. On fees, SENT is cheaper at 1.01% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LSEQ has performed better with a 25.44% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SENT is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.70% for LSEQ.

LSEQ has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.70% for LSEQ and 1.01% for SENT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSEQ and SENT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer