PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSCC vs. NVDA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LSCC vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 74.38% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 17.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 35.59%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 65.44% annualized return.


LSCC

1D
-7.02%
1M
-6.55%
6M
56.88%
YTD
74.38%
1Y
128.55%
3Y*
11.45%
5Y*
15.84%
10Y*
35.59%
ALL TIME*
12.36%

NVDA

1D
3.43%
1M
12.10%
6M
26.00%
YTD
17.69%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
70.03%
5Y*
60.95%
10Y*
65.44%
ALL TIME*
36.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$298.03M$248.98M$285.29M
$27.47B$26.79B$31.85B

LSCC vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
74.38%29.89%-17.89%6.33%-15.81%68.18%139.39%176.59%19.72%-21.47%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
17.69%38.92%171.25%239.02%-50.26%125.48%122.30%76.94%-30.82%81.99%

Correlation

The correlation between LSCC and NVDA is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999

0.50

The correlation between LSCC and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.60 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LSCC:

$17.58B

NVDA:

$5.31T

EPS

LSCC:

$0.26

NVDA:

$6.53

PE Ratio

LSCC:

489.43

NVDA:

33.56

PS Ratio

LSCC:

27.30

NVDA:

21.13

PB Ratio

LSCC:

23.51

NVDA:

27.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

LSCC:

$651.12M

NVDA:

$253.49B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LSCC:

$440.51M

NVDA:

$187.95B

EBITDA (TTM)

LSCC:

$66.91M

NVDA:

$192.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSCC vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSCC
LSCC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
LSCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSCC Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
LSCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSCC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

NVDA
NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSCC vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSCCNVDADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.13

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.75

1.15

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

2.33

+13.07

LSCC vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSCC Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is higher than the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSCC and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSCC vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, which is greater than NVDA's maximum drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and NVDA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSCCNVDADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.34%

-89.72%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-20.21%

-7.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.09%

-36.88%

-24.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.09%

-66.34%

+5.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.09%

-66.34%

+5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.36%

-6.90%

-10.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-54.95%

-36.06%

-18.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.38%

9.96%

-1.58%

Volatility

LSCC vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 22.92% compared to NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) at 12.81%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSCCNVDADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.92%

12.81%

+10.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.70%

28.40%

+21.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.66%

36.50%

+24.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.56%

51.92%

+3.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.24%

49.98%

+1.26%

Dividends

LSCC vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

LSCC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
0.13%0.02%0.03%0.03%0.11%0.05%0.12%0.27%0.46%0.29%0.45%1.20%

Financials

LSCC vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LSCC vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and NVIDIA Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LSCC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 141.33M and revenue of 201.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.3%.

NVDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.

LSCC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 21.75M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.

NVDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.

LSCC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 19.36M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

NVDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LSCC and NVDA have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSCC has higher volatility (22.92%) compared to NVDA (12.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCC dropped -97.34% vs NVDA's -89.72%.

LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSCC and NVDA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer