LSCC vs. BLDR
LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) and BLDR (Builders FirstSource, Inc.) are both stocks. LSCC operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while BLDR operates in Building Products & Equipment (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LSCC returned 35.59%/yr vs 19.70%/yr for BLDR. Their 0.34 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LSCC vs. BLDR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSCC achieves a 74.38% return, which is significantly higher than BLDR's -26.27% return. Over the past 10 years, LSCC has outperformed BLDR with an annualized return of 35.59%, while BLDR has yielded a comparatively lower 19.70% annualized return.
LSCC
- 1D
- -7.02%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- 6M
- 56.88%
- YTD
- 74.38%
- 1Y
- 128.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- 35.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
BLDR
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- 6M
- -38.72%
- YTD
- -26.27%
- 1Y
- -42.94%
- 3Y*
- -20.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.91%
- 10Y*
- 19.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.92%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $189.91M | $172.28M | $192.28M | |
| $298.03M | $248.98M | $285.29M |
LSCC vs. BLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 74.38% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
BLDR Builders FirstSource, Inc. | -26.27% | -28.01% | -14.38% | 157.31% | -24.30% | 110.02% | 60.61% | 132.91% | -49.93% | 98.63% |
Correlation
The correlation between LSCC and BLDR is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.43 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2005 | 0.34 |
The correlation between LSCC and BLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LSCC:
$17.58B
BLDR:
$8.16B
LSCC:
$0.26
BLDR:
$0.93
LSCC:
489.43
BLDR:
81.43
LSCC:
27.30
BLDR:
0.58
LSCC:
23.51
BLDR:
2.06
LSCC:
$651.12M
BLDR:
$14.45B
LSCC:
$440.51M
BLDR:
$4.22B
LSCC:
$66.91M
BLDR:
$734.47M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LSCC vs. BLDR — Risk / Return Rank
LSCC
BLDR
LSCC vs. BLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) and Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LSCC | BLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 0.87 | +0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.75 | -0.77 | +5.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.39 | -1.25 | +16.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LSCC vs. BLDR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSCC drawdown since its inception was -97.34%, roughly equal to the maximum BLDR drawdown of -96.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSCC and BLDR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSCC | BLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.34% | -96.78% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.25% | -55.76% | +28.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.09% | -68.73% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.09% | -68.73% | +7.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.09% | -68.73% | +7.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.36% | -64.07% | +46.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.95% | -47.97% | -6.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.38% | 34.49% | -26.11% |
Volatility
LSCC vs. BLDR - Volatility Comparison
Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a higher volatility of 22.92% compared to Builders FirstSource, Inc. (BLDR) at 17.41%. This indicates that LSCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LSCC | BLDR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.92% | 17.41% | +5.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.70% | 37.81% | +11.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 60.66% | 50.48% | +10.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.56% | 46.07% | +9.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.24% | 48.05% | +3.19% |
Dividends
LSCC vs. BLDR - Dividend Comparison
Neither LSCC nor BLDR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LSCC vs. BLDR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lattice Semiconductor Corporation and Builders FirstSource, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LSCC vs. BLDR - Profitability Comparison
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 141.33M and revenue of 201.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.3%.
BLDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.09B and revenue of 3.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.1%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 21.75M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
BLDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported an operating income of 128.51M and revenue of 3.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.3%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 19.36M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
BLDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Builders FirstSource, Inc. reported a net income of -3.90M and revenue of 3.86B, resulting in a net margin of -0.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LSCC and BLDR have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSCC has higher volatility (22.92%) compared to BLDR (17.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSCC dropped -97.34% vs BLDR's -96.78%.
LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LSCC and BLDR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer