LSBDX vs. LSIGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX).
LSBDX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on May 15, 1991. LSIGX is managed by Loomis Sayles Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 1994.
Performance
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund | -1.54% | 8.67% | 6.70% | 8.05% | -12.50% | 3.23% | 2.14% | 11.72% | -2.87% | 7.47% |
LSIGX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund | -1.06% | 7.15% | 3.14% | 8.01% | -11.98% | 0.80% | 7.18% | 9.36% | -2.08% | 8.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -1.54% return, which is significantly lower than LSIGX's -1.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LSBDX has outperformed LSIGX with an annualized return of 3.45%, while LSIGX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.93% annualized return.
LSBDX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -2.92%
- YTD
- -1.54%
- 6M
- -0.05%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.19%
- 5Y*
- 2.44%
- 10Y*
- 3.45%
LSIGX
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.75%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- 1Y
- 3.42%
- 3Y*
- 4.47%
- 5Y*
- 1.44%
- 10Y*
- 2.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than LSIGX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LSBDX vs. LSIGX — Risk / Return Rank
LSBDX
LSIGX
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LSBDX | LSIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.57 | 1.08 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.52 | +0.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.20 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.67 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 5.89 | +3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LSBDX | LSIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.08 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.29 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.64 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.41 | 1.15 | +0.26 |
Correlation
The correlation between LSBDX and LSIGX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Dividend Comparison
LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.90%, less than LSIGX's 4.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSBDX Loomis Sayles Bond Fund | 3.90% | 4.15% | 5.51% | 5.09% | 5.13% | 2.88% | 3.83% | 3.97% | 3.78% | 5.86% | 3.13% | 7.37% |
LSIGX Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund | 4.61% | 4.76% | 4.69% | 4.06% | 4.14% | 5.95% | 6.24% | 2.59% | 3.42% | 4.27% | 4.32% | 3.81% |
Drawdowns
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than LSIGX's maximum drawdown of -20.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and LSIGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LSBDX | LSIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.58% | -20.94% | -9.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.25% | -3.35% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.60% | -15.98% | -0.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.60% | -15.98% | -0.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -2.75% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.80% | -2.40% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 0.95% | -0.27% |
Volatility
LSBDX vs. LSIGX - Volatility Comparison
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) have volatilities of 1.42% and 1.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LSBDX | LSIGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.47% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 2.60% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.87% | 4.66% | -0.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 5.22% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.89% | 4.67% | +0.22% |