PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSBDX vs. PONAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than PONAX's 0.64% return. Over the past 10 years, LSBDX has underperformed PONAX with an annualized return of 3.34%, while PONAX has yielded a comparatively higher 4.28% annualized return.


LSBDX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
3.34%

PONAX

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.21%
1Y
7.76%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
4.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
-0.19%8.67%6.70%8.05%-12.50%3.23%2.14%11.72%-2.87%7.47%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
0.64%10.63%5.02%8.96%-9.34%2.21%5.40%7.65%0.21%8.19%

Correlation

The correlation between LSBDX and PONAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2007

0.56

The correlation between LSBDX and PONAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSBDX vs. PONAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSBDX
LSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

PONAX
PONAX Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
PONAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PONAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
PONAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
PONAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
PONAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSBDXPONAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

1.88

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

2.81

-0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

2.38

-0.43

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

8.21

-1.69

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the PONAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSBDX and PONAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSBDXPONAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.88

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.64

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

1.02

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

1.48

-0.07

Drawdowns

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than PONAX's maximum drawdown of -13.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and PONAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSBDXPONAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-13.64%

-16.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-3.69%

+0.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.55%

-3.90%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-13.64%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.60%

-13.64%

-2.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-1.22%

-0.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-1.80%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

1.07%

-0.10%

Volatility

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) is 1.28%, while PIMCO Income Fund Class A (PONAX) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that LSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PONAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSBDXPONAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

1.67%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

3.25%

-0.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

4.11%

-0.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.01%

4.81%

+0.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

4.21%

+0.67%

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than PONAX's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSBDX vs. PONAX - Dividend Comparison

LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, less than PONAX's 5.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
3.87%4.15%5.51%5.09%5.13%2.88%3.83%3.97%3.78%5.86%3.13%7.37%
PONAX
PIMCO Income Fund Class A
5.44%5.61%5.86%5.86%4.66%3.62%4.48%5.42%5.24%4.97%5.13%7.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSBDX and PONAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PONAX has higher volatility (1.67%) compared to LSBDX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSBDX dropped -30.58% vs PONAX's -13.64%.

PONAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSBDX and PONAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer