PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSBDX vs. FAGIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -1.33% return, which is significantly lower than FAGIX's 5.47% return. Over the past 10 years, LSBDX has underperformed FAGIX with an annualized return of 2.92%, while FAGIX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.47% annualized return.


LSBDX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.82%
6M
-1.75%
YTD
-1.33%
1Y
2.42%
3Y*
6.10%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
2.92%
ALL TIME*
7.23%

FAGIX

1D
1.00%
1M
-1.59%
6M
3.79%
YTD
5.47%
1Y
11.22%
3Y*
11.21%
5Y*
6.17%
10Y*
7.47%
ALL TIME*
6.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
-1.33%8.67%6.70%8.05%-12.50%3.23%2.14%11.72%-2.87%7.47%
FAGIX
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund
5.47%12.38%10.69%13.02%-11.50%11.13%9.95%18.96%-7.17%11.66%

Correlation

The correlation between LSBDX and FAGIX is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 1991

0.46

The correlation between LSBDX and FAGIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.58 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSBDX vs. FAGIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LSBDX
LSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
LSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FAGIX
FAGIX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FAGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FAGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LSBDXFAGIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.28

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.87

2.72

-1.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.12

10.26

-8.14

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.81, which is lower than the FAGIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSBDX and FAGIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, smaller than the maximum FAGIX drawdown of -37.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and FAGIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSBDXFAGIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-37.97%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-4.02%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.95%

-7.26%

+2.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-15.42%

-1.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.60%

-28.45%

+11.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.72%

-3.07%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.79%

-6.97%

+4.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

1.06%

+0.18%

Volatility

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) is 0.86%, while Fidelity Capital & Income Fund (FAGIX) has a volatility of 2.24%. This indicates that LSBDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAGIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSBDXFAGIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

2.24%

-1.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.79%

5.94%

-3.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.48%

7.04%

-3.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.04%

6.79%

-1.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

7.84%

-3.03%

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both LSBDX and FAGIX have an expense ratio of 0.67%.


Dividends

LSBDX vs. FAGIX - Dividend Comparison

LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, less than FAGIX's 5.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAGIX
Fidelity Capital & Income Fund
5.05%4.74%5.02%5.28%10.25%6.08%4.59%5.00%5.67%5.05%4.57%4.51%
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
3.92%4.15%5.51%5.09%5.13%2.88%3.83%3.97%3.78%5.86%3.13%7.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSBDX and FAGIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAGIX has higher volatility (2.24%) compared to LSBDX (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSBDX dropped -30.58% vs FAGIX's -37.97%.

FAGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSBDX and FAGIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer