PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSIGX vs. LSFIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSIGX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than LSFIX's 0.33% return. Over the past 10 years, LSIGX has underperformed LSFIX with an annualized return of 2.87%, while LSFIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.98% annualized return.


LSIGX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.57%
YTD
0.09%
6M
0.13%
1Y
5.16%
3Y*
5.16%
5Y*
1.34%
10Y*
2.87%

LSFIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.25%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.61%
1Y
5.95%
3Y*
6.82%
5Y*
2.34%
10Y*
3.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSIGX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund
0.09%7.15%3.14%8.01%-11.98%0.80%7.18%9.36%-2.08%8.42%
LSFIX
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund
0.33%9.10%5.39%8.21%-11.74%2.89%5.38%13.56%-3.07%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between LSIGX and LSFIX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 1995

0.87

The correlation between LSIGX and LSFIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSIGX vs. LSFIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSIGX
LSIGX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
LSIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
LSIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

LSFIX
LSFIX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
LSFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
LSFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSIGXLSFIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.61

2.16

-0.55

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

3.29

-0.89

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.43

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.93

2.60

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.68

9.03

-3.35

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the LSFIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSIGX and LSFIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSIGXLSFIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.16

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

0.49

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.82

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.90

+0.26

Drawdowns

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSIGX drawdown since its inception was -20.94%, smaller than the maximum LSFIX drawdown of -26.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSIGX and LSFIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSIGXLSFIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.94%

-26.33%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.22%

-2.80%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.42%

-5.45%

+0.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.98%

-15.86%

-0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.98%

-19.60%

+3.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.62%

-1.07%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.40%

-3.25%

+0.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.24%

0.84%

+0.40%

Volatility

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund (LSIGX) and Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund (LSFIX) have volatilities of 1.26% and 1.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSIGXLSFIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

1.30%

-0.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.69%

2.50%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

3.37%

+0.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.25%

4.92%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.68%

4.95%

-0.27%

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSIGX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than LSFIX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSIGX vs. LSFIX - Dividend Comparison

LSIGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, which matches LSFIX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSFIX
Loomis Sayles Fixed Income Fund
4.68%4.70%5.79%4.41%1.53%6.23%6.23%4.24%5.62%5.62%3.57%6.77%
LSIGX
Loomis Sayles Investment Grade Fixed Income Fund
4.72%4.76%4.69%4.06%4.14%5.95%6.24%2.59%3.42%4.27%4.32%3.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSIGX and LSFIX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSFIX has higher volatility (1.30%) compared to LSIGX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSIGX dropped -20.94% vs LSFIX's -26.33%.

LSFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSIGX and LSFIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer