PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LSBDX vs. VGSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSBDX achieves a -0.19% return, which is significantly lower than VGSH's 0.52% return. Over the past 10 years, LSBDX has outperformed VGSH with an annualized return of 3.34%, while VGSH has yielded a comparatively lower 1.74% annualized return.


LSBDX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.07%
YTD
-0.19%
6M
0.30%
1Y
5.12%
3Y*
7.01%
5Y*
2.21%
10Y*
3.34%

VGSH

1D
0.00%
1M
0.01%
YTD
0.52%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.45%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
1.83%
10Y*
1.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
-0.19%8.67%6.70%8.05%-12.50%3.23%2.14%11.72%-2.87%7.47%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
0.52%5.07%4.00%4.31%-3.86%-0.60%3.04%3.52%1.55%0.04%

Correlation

The correlation between LSBDX and VGSH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2009

0.27

Over the past year, LSBDX and VGSH have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.27, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LSBDX vs. VGSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSBDX
LSBDX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
LSBDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LSBDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
LSBDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LSBDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
LSBDX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

VGSH
VGSH Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
VGSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGSH Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
VGSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGSH Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) and Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LSBDXVGSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.79

2.69

-0.90

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.70

4.45

-1.75

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.57

-0.23

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.81

-1.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.52

15.25

-8.74

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSBDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the VGSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSBDX and VGSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LSBDXVGSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.69

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.93

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

1.11

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

1.02

+0.39

Drawdowns

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSBDX drawdown since its inception was -30.58%, which is greater than VGSH's maximum drawdown of -5.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSBDX and VGSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LSBDXVGSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.58%

-5.70%

-24.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.25%

-0.88%

-2.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.55%

-0.97%

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.60%

-5.66%

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.60%

-5.70%

-10.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.59%

-0.26%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.80%

-0.60%

-2.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.97%

0.22%

+0.75%

Volatility

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Volatility Comparison

Loomis Sayles Bond Fund (LSBDX) has a higher volatility of 1.28% compared to Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF (VGSH) at 0.36%. This indicates that LSBDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LSBDXVGSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.28%

0.36%

+0.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

0.88%

+1.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

1.29%

+2.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.01%

1.97%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.88%

1.57%

+3.31%

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSBDX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than VGSH's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

LSBDX vs. VGSH - Dividend Comparison

LSBDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%, which matches VGSH's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LSBDX
Loomis Sayles Bond Fund
3.87%4.15%5.51%5.09%5.13%2.88%3.83%3.97%3.78%5.86%3.13%7.37%
VGSH
Vanguard Short-Term Treasury ETF
3.87%4.00%4.18%3.31%1.15%0.66%1.74%2.28%1.79%1.10%0.84%0.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


LSBDX and VGSH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LSBDX has higher volatility (1.28%) compared to VGSH (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LSBDX dropped -30.58% vs VGSH's -5.70%.

VGSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LSBDX and VGSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer