LSAT vs. PMMF

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF).

LSAT and PMMF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LSAT is an actively managed fund by Redwood. It was launched on Oct 27, 2020. PMMF is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Feb 4, 2025.

Performance

LSAT vs. PMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LSAT vs. PMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.40%	-2.88%
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF	0.86%	3.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LSAT achieves a 1.40% return, which is significantly higher than PMMF's 0.86% return.

LSAT

• 1D: 1.77%
• 1M: -1.78%
• YTD: 1.40%
• 6M: -2.97%
• 1Y: 0.13%
• 3Y*: 9.21%
• 5Y*: 5.57%
• 10Y*: —

PMMF

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.28%
• YTD: 0.86%
• 6M: 1.87%
• 1Y: 4.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LSAT vs. PMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

LSAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than PMMF's 0.20% expense ratio.

LSAT

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF

PMMF

iShares Prime Money Market ETF

Return for Risk

LSAT vs. PMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LSAT

LSAT Risk / Return Rank: 12
LSAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
LSAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
LSAT Omega Ratio Rank: 12
LSAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
LSAT Martin Ratio Rank: 13

PMMF

PMMF Risk / Return Rank: 100
PMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
PMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
PMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 100
PMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LSAT vs. PMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) and iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LSAT	PMMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	13.39	-13.38
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.13	25.27	-25.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	11.71	-10.70
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.07	31.70	-31.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.21	381.69	-381.48
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LSAT vs. PMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LSAT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the PMMF Sharpe Ratio of 13.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LSAT and PMMF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LSAT	PMMF	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01	13.39	-13.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.65	11.51	-10.85

Correlation

The correlation between LSAT and PMMF is -0.02. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

LSAT vs. PMMF - Dividend Comparison

LSAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.87%, less than PMMF's 3.91% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
LSAT Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF	1.87%	1.90%	1.31%	1.85%	0.36%	3.44%	0.30%
PMMF iShares Prime Money Market ETF	3.91%	3.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

LSAT vs. PMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LSAT drawdown since its inception was -20.48%, which is greater than PMMF's maximum drawdown of -0.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LSAT and PMMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	LSAT	PMMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.48%	-0.13%	-20.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.54%	-0.13%	-13.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	0.00%	-6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.68%	0.00%	-5.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.22%	0.01%	+4.21%

Volatility

LSAT vs. PMMF - Volatility Comparison

Leadershares Alphafactor Tactical Focused ETF (LSAT) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to iShares Prime Money Market ETF (PMMF) at 0.05%. This indicates that LSAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LSAT	PMMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.05%	0.05%	+4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.35%	0.13%	+9.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	0.31%	+16.95%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.28%	0.36%	+15.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.90%	0.36%	+16.54%