LRSCX vs. SSCVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

LRSCX (Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund) and SSCVX (Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX returned 8.08%/yr vs 9.86%/yr for SSCVX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRSCX charges 1.17%/yr vs 1.28%/yr for SSCVX.

Performance

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRSCX achieves a 16.93% return, which is significantly lower than SSCVX's 22.84% return. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX has underperformed SSCVX with an annualized return of 8.08%, while SSCVX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.86% annualized return.

LRSCX

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 4.98%
• YTD: 16.93%
• 6M: 14.86%
• 1Y: 26.34%
• 3Y*: 14.08%
• 5Y*: 6.29%
• 10Y*: 8.08%

SSCVX

• 1D: 1.09%
• 1M: 2.19%
• YTD: 22.84%
• 6M: 20.88%
• 1Y: 36.16%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 8.38%
• 10Y*: 9.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund	16.93%	0.61%	12.66%	19.81%	-17.48%	26.24%	-1.49%	20.41%	-11.90%	6.49%
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	22.84%	5.46%	12.33%	12.47%	-15.35%	31.25%	9.61%	18.76%	-13.70%	12.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LRSCX and SSCVX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1998	0.91

The correlation between LRSCX and SSCVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LRSCX vs. SSCVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRSCX

LRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 39
LRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 36
LRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
LRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
LRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
LRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

SSCVX

SSCVX Risk / Return Rank: 73
SSCVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SSCVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SSCVX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
SSCVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
SSCVX Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRSCX	SSCVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	2.18	-0.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	3.13	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.37	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.52	4.87	-2.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.87	14.96	-7.09

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SSCVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRSCX and SSCVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, smaller than the maximum SSCVX drawdown of -65.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRSCX and SSCVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRSCX	SSCVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.02%	-65.34%	+11.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-7.88%	-3.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.24%	-29.22%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-29.22%	-0.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.25%	-48.87%	-1.38%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.21%	+1.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.75%	-11.83%	+3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	2.56%	+1.01%

Volatility

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund (SSCVX) have volatilities of 5.14% and 5.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRSCX	SSCVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	5.41%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.07%	12.30%	-0.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.55%	17.66%	-0.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.33%	21.20%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.38%	23.47%	-0.09%

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRSCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is lower than SSCVX's 1.28% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRSCX vs. SSCVX - Dividend Comparison

LRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than SSCVX's 8.92% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund	5.71%	6.68%	11.06%	0.12%	3.79%	17.08%	1.06%	19.56%	20.44%	14.33%	14.14%	24.30%
SSCVX Columbia Select Small Cap Value Fund	8.92%	10.96%	20.45%	6.56%	4.62%	6.64%	6.45%	0.12%	7.59%	13.50%	6.18%	12.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRSCX and SSCVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, LRSCX and SSCVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, LRSCX or SSCVX?

SSCVX has higher volatility (5.41%) compared to LRSCX (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRSCX dropped -54.02% vs SSCVX's -65.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.