LRSCX vs. PMJAX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LRSCX (Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund) and PMJAX (PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX returned 7.14%/yr vs 13.16%/yr for PMJAX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRSCX charges 1.17%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for PMJAX.

Performance

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRSCX achieves a 10.76% return, which is significantly lower than PMJAX's 17.31% return. Over the past 10 years, LRSCX has underperformed PMJAX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while PMJAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.16% annualized return.

LRSCX

• 1D: -0.81%
• 1M: -1.72%
• YTD: 10.76%
• 6M: 11.95%
• 1Y: 23.93%
• 3Y*: 12.01%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: 7.14%

PMJAX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: 4.75%
• YTD: 17.31%
• 6M: 16.94%
• 1Y: 35.74%
• 3Y*: 21.21%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: 13.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund	10.76%	0.61%	12.66%	19.81%	-17.48%	26.24%	-1.49%	20.41%	-11.90%	6.49%
PMJAX PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A	17.31%	4.89%	20.53%	19.76%	-5.07%	38.48%	6.52%	19.76%	-12.02%	8.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LRSCX and PMJAX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.93

The correlation between LRSCX and PMJAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

LRSCX vs. PMJAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRSCX

LRSCX Risk / Return Rank: 25
LRSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
LRSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
LRSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 22
LRSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
LRSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 26

PMJAX

PMJAX Risk / Return Rank: 60
PMJAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
PMJAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
PMJAX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
PMJAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
PMJAX Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRSCX	PMJAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.38	2.07	-0.69
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	2.94	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.35	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.05	4.45	-2.40
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.42	13.27	-6.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the PMJAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRSCX and PMJAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRSCX	PMJAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.38	2.07	-0.69
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	0.25	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	0.39	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.40	+0.08

Drawdowns

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than PMJAX's maximum drawdown of -50.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRSCX and PMJAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRSCX	PMJAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.02%	-50.53%	-3.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.18%	-7.66%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.24%	-26.72%	-2.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.24%	-50.53%	+21.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.25%	-50.53%	+0.28%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.10%	0.00%	-3.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.77%	-17.04%	+8.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.57%	2.57%	+1.00%

Volatility

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Volatility Comparison

Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund (LRSCX) and PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A (PMJAX) have volatilities of 4.83% and 4.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRSCX	PMJAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.83%	4.98%	-0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.62%	11.43%	+0.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.29%	17.14%	+0.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.35%	40.27%	-18.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.35%	33.57%	-10.22%

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRSCX has a 1.17% expense ratio, which is higher than PMJAX's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRSCX vs. PMJAX - Dividend Comparison

LRSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.03%, more than PMJAX's 2.82% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LRSCX Lord Abbett Small Cap Value Fund	6.03%	6.68%	11.06%	0.12%	3.79%	17.08%	1.06%	19.56%	20.44%	14.33%	14.14%	24.30%
PMJAX PIMCO RAE US Small Fund Class A	2.82%	3.31%	2.48%	1.40%	10.08%	67.74%	9.44%	1.37%	7.72%	4.51%	1.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRSCX and PMJAX in my portfolio?

LRSCX and PMJAX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRSCX or PMJAX?

PMJAX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to LRSCX (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRSCX dropped -54.02% vs PMJAX's -50.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PMJAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.