LRND vs. DFND

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) and DFND (Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - LRND tracks the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross while DFND tracks the Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LRND returned 23.71%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for DFND. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LRND charges 0.14%/yr vs 1.50%/yr for DFND.

Performance

LRND vs. DFND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LRND

• 1D: -1.16%
• 1M: 7.42%
• YTD: 11.98%
• 6M: 11.46%
• 1Y: 34.53%
• 3Y*: 23.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DFND

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.09%
• 1Y: 0.20%
• 3Y*: 7.91%
• 5Y*: 4.54%
• 10Y*: 7.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRND vs. DFND - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF	11.98%	20.31%	21.68%	44.13%	-19.33%
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.00%	10.37%	8.48%	12.13%	-11.09%

Correlation

The correlation between LRND and DFND is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.40

Over the past year, the correlation between LRND and DFND has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

LRND vs. DFND - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LRND	DFND
Technology	57.8%	24.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	0.8%
Healthcare	10.1%	10.7%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	3.5%
Industrials	5.5%	17.1%
Consumer Defensive	1.9%	4.2%
Basic Materials	0.9%	4.3%
Financial Services	0.0%	18.2%
Energy	-	1.7%
Real Estate	-	2.0%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LRND vs. DFND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRND

LRND Risk / Return Rank: 62
LRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
LRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
LRND Omega Ratio Rank: 65
LRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
LRND Martin Ratio Rank: 58

DFND

DFND Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Omega Ratio Rank: 8
DFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
DFND Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRND vs. DFND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LRND	DFND	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	0.02	+2.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	0.11	+2.95
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.02	+0.38
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	0.07	+2.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.01	0.13	+9.89
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LRND vs. DFND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRND Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the DFND Sharpe Ratio of 0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRND and DFND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LRND	DFND	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.28	0.02	+2.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.38	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.36	+0.46

Drawdowns

LRND vs. DFND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRND drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, which is greater than DFND's maximum drawdown of -22.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRND and DFND.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRND	DFND	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.43%	-22.65%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.83%	-3.44%	-10.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.06%	-12.56%	-8.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-22.65%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-22.65%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.16%	-3.69%	+2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.24%	-5.70%	-0.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	3.70%	-0.24%

Volatility

LRND vs. DFND - Volatility Comparison

IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a higher volatility of 3.73% compared to Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF (DFND) at 0.00%. This indicates that LRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFND based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRND	DFND	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.73%	0.00%	+3.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.84%	6.16%	+5.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.24%	10.92%	+4.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.99%	22.46%	-2.47%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.99%	19.09%	+0.90%

LRND vs. DFND - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRND has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than DFND's 1.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

LRND vs. DFND - Dividend Comparison

LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than DFND's 0.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
DFND Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender ETF	0.62%	1.10%	1.64%	1.84%	0.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.77%	0.53%	0.02%
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF	0.49%	0.67%	0.97%	1.22%	1.32%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRND and DFND in my portfolio?

LRND and DFND have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRND or DFND?

LRND has higher volatility (3.73%) compared to DFND (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRND dropped -25.43% vs DFND's -22.65%.

Which ETF is better, LRND or DFND?

On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 23.71% vs 7.91% for DFND. On fees, LRND is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, DFND has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LRND or DFND?

Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 23.71% return vs 7.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LRND or DFND?

LRND is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for DFND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LRND or DFND?

DFND has the higher dividend yield at 0.62%, compared with 0.49% for LRND.

What is the main difference between LRND and DFND?

LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while DFND tracks Siren DIVCON Dividend Defender Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and SRN Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for LRND and 1.50% for DFND.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.