LRND vs. IVV
LRND (IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF) and IVV (iShares Core S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRND is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVV is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LRND returned 24.19%/yr vs 22.74%/yr for IVV. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRND charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for IVV.
Performance
LRND vs. IVV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRND achieves a 13.29% return, which is significantly higher than IVV's 11.70% return.
LRND
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 8.41%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 6M
- 12.35%
- 1Y
- 36.98%
- 3Y*
- 24.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IVV
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- 5.39%
- YTD
- 11.70%
- 6M
- 12.12%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.74%
- 5Y*
- 14.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.62%
LRND vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 13.29% | 20.31% | 21.68% | 44.13% | -19.33% |
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 11.70% | 17.85% | 24.93% | 26.31% | -13.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRND and IVV is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022 | 0.94 |
The correlation between LRND and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.
LRND vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LRND
IVV
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Financial Services
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
LRND
IVV
Communication Services
LRND
IVV
Healthcare
LRND
IVV
Consumer Cyclical
LRND
IVV
Industrials
LRND
IVV
Consumer Defensive
LRND
IVV
Basic Materials
LRND
IVV
Financial Services
LRND
IVV
Energy
LRND
-
IVV
Real Estate
LRND
-
IVV
Utilities
LRND
-
IVV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRND vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank
LRND
IVV
LRND vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRND | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.45 | 2.54 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.27 | 3.44 | -0.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.46 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | 3.43 | -0.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 15.97 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRND | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.45 | 2.54 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.87 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.83 | 0.46 | +0.37 |
Drawdowns
LRND vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRND drawdown since its inception was -25.43%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRND and IVV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRND | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.43% | -55.25% | +29.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.83% | -8.89% | -4.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.06% | -18.75% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.25% | -10.78% | +4.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 1.91% | +1.55% |
Volatility
LRND vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison
IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF (LRND) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) at 2.75%. This indicates that LRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRND | IVV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.44% | 2.75% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.78% | 8.87% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.19% | 11.78% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 16.88% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.99% | 18.05% | +1.94% |
LRND vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRND has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LRND vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison
LRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.48%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVV iShares Core S&P 500 ETF | 1.06% | 1.17% | 1.30% | 1.44% | 1.66% | 1.20% | 1.57% | 1.85% | 2.21% | 1.75% | 2.01% | 2.27% |
LRND IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders ETF | 0.48% | 0.67% | 0.97% | 1.22% | 1.32% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LRND and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
LRND has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to IVV (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRND dropped -25.43% vs IVV's -55.25%.
On 3-year performance, LRND leads with 24.19% vs 22.74% for IVV. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, IVV has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, LRND has performed better with a 24.19% return vs 22.74%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for LRND.
IVV has the higher dividend yield at 1.06%, compared with 0.48% for LRND.
LRND is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IVV is S&P 500. LRND tracks IQ U.S. Large Cap R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for LRND and 0.03% for IVV.
IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRND and IVV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer