LRN vs. CRS
LRN (Stride, Inc.) and CRS (Carpenter Technology Corporation) are both stocks. LRN operates in Education & Training Services (Consumer Defensive), while CRS operates in Metal Fabrication (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LRN returned 23.80%/yr vs 35.01%/yr for CRS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRN vs. CRS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRN achieves a 50.49% return, which is significantly lower than CRS's 78.53% return. Over the past 10 years, LRN has underperformed CRS with an annualized return of 23.80%, while CRS has yielded a comparatively higher 35.01% annualized return.
LRN
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- 10.87%
- YTD
- 50.49%
- 6M
- 51.49%
- 1Y
- -31.17%
- 3Y*
- 33.90%
- 5Y*
- 26.27%
- 10Y*
- 23.80%
CRS
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 28.68%
- YTD
- 78.53%
- 6M
- 74.76%
- 1Y
- 126.60%
- 3Y*
- 121.69%
- 5Y*
- 68.28%
- 10Y*
- 35.01%
LRN vs. CRS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRN Stride, Inc. | 50.49% | -37.53% | 75.05% | 89.80% | -6.15% | 56.99% | 4.32% | -17.91% | 55.91% | -7.34% |
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 78.53% | 86.23% | 141.72% | 94.48% | 29.50% | 2.66% | -39.44% | 42.12% | -29.16% | 43.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRN and CRS is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2007 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, the correlation between LRN and CRS has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.28, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
LRN:
$4.65B
CRS:
$28.24B
LRN:
$9.68
CRS:
$9.51
LRN:
10.10
CRS:
59.07
LRN:
0.25
CRS:
0.05
LRN:
1.86
CRS:
9.34
LRN:
2.83
CRS:
13.66
LRN:
$2.54B
CRS:
$3.03B
LRN:
$972.24M
CRS:
$900.50M
LRN:
$424.60M
CRS:
$745.50M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRN vs. CRS — Risk / Return Rank
LRN
CRS
LRN vs. CRS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stride, Inc. (LRN) and Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRN | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.44 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.49 | 6.68 | -7.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.74 | 15.72 | -16.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRN vs. CRS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRN drawdown since its inception was -81.41%, roughly equal to the maximum CRS drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRN and CRS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRN | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.41% | -84.68% | +3.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -64.07% | -19.08% | -44.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -64.07% | -28.74% | -35.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -64.07% | -41.86% | -22.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.07% | -74.70% | +10.63% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.46% | -0.17% | -42.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.27% | -27.23% | -9.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 42.11% | 8.09% | +34.02% |
Volatility
LRN vs. CRS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stride, Inc. (LRN) is 8.21%, while Carpenter Technology Corporation (CRS) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that LRN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRN | CRS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.21% | 12.83% | -4.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.17% | 33.92% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.70% | 48.29% | +18.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.40% | 46.70% | +4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 48.88% | +0.34% |
Dividends
LRN vs. CRS - Dividend Comparison
LRN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CRS Carpenter Technology Corporation | 0.14% | 0.25% | 0.47% | 1.13% | 2.17% | 2.74% | 2.75% | 1.61% | 2.13% | 1.41% | 1.99% | 2.38% |
LRN Stride, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LRN vs. CRS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stride, Inc. and Carpenter Technology Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRN vs. CRS - Profitability Comparison
LRN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a gross profit of 231.56M and revenue of 629.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.8%.
CRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a gross profit of 251.80M and revenue of 811.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.0%.
LRN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported an operating income of 129.08M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 20.5%.
CRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported an operating income of 186.50M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 23.0%.
LRN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stride, Inc. reported a net income of 248.49M and revenue of 629.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.5%.
CRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carpenter Technology Corporation reported a net income of 139.60M and revenue of 811.50M, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRN and CRS have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CRS has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to LRN (8.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRN dropped -81.41% vs CRS's -84.68%.
CRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRN and CRS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer