LRGF vs. UUP
LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) and UUP (Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while UUP is a Currency fund tracking the Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LRGF returned 13.70%/yr vs 3.17%/yr for UUP. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. LRGF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UUP.
Performance
LRGF vs. UUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than UUP's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, LRGF has outperformed UUP with an annualized return of 13.70%, while UUP has yielded a comparatively lower 3.17% annualized return.
LRGF
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- 6M
- 8.30%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 1Y
- 18.87%
- 3Y*
- 20.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.48%
- 10Y*
- 13.70%
UUP
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.97%
- 6M
- 4.47%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 1Y
- 8.28%
- 3Y*
- 5.86%
- 5Y*
- 5.89%
- 10Y*
- 3.17%
LRGF vs. UUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 9.81% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 25.85% | -14.77% | 25.01% | 11.11% | 26.11% | -9.66% | 21.13% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 5.44% | -4.99% | 13.50% | 3.63% | 9.46% | 5.73% | -6.66% | 4.09% | 7.05% | -9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGF and UUP is -0.33, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 2015 | -0.15 |
The correlation between LRGF and UUP shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGF vs. UUP — Risk / Return Rank
LRGF
UUP
LRGF vs. UUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRGF | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.11 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.25 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.28 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.37 | 6.26 | +2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRGF vs. UUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than UUP's maximum drawdown of -22.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and UUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGF | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -22.19% | -13.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -3.65% | -5.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | -10.05% | -9.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | -10.37% | -11.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | -14.24% | -21.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -1.26% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.52% | -8.88% | +4.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.26% | 1.33% | +0.93% |
Volatility
LRGF vs. UUP - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) has a higher volatility of 3.79% compared to Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund (UUP) at 1.45%. This indicates that LRGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGF | UUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.79% | 1.45% | +2.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.97% | 4.34% | +5.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 6.03% | +6.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.09% | 7.22% | +9.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 6.90% | +11.39% |
LRGF vs. UUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than UUP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRGF vs. UUP - Dividend Comparison
LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than UUP's 3.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.08% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
UUP Invesco DB US Dollar Index Bullish Fund | 3.25% | 3.43% | 4.48% | 6.44% | 0.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.03% | 1.08% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRGF and UUP have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRGF has higher volatility (3.79%) compared to UUP (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs UUP's -22.19%.
On 10-year performance, LRGF leads with 13.70% vs 3.17% for UUP. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, UUP has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 13.70% return vs 3.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UUP.
UUP has the higher dividend yield at 3.25%, compared with 1.08% for LRGF.
LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while UUP is Currency. LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while UUP tracks Deutsche Bank Long US Dollar Index (USDX) Futures Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.75% for UUP.
LRGF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.51 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRGF and UUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer