PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRGF vs. DJUN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRGF vs. DJUN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than DJUN's 3.77% return.


LRGF

1D
0.18%
1M
6.67%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.73%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
14.11%

DJUN

1D
0.07%
1M
0.67%
YTD
3.77%
6M
4.61%
1Y
11.75%
3Y*
11.39%
5Y*
8.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. DJUN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
11.29%16.48%26.59%25.85%-14.77%25.01%21.86%
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
3.77%9.38%13.92%17.58%-6.30%6.27%6.48%

Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and DJUN is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2020

0.90

The correlation between LRGF and DJUN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRGF vs. DJUN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF
LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

DJUN
DJUN Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
DJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
DJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
DJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. DJUN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRGFDJUNDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.36

-0.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

3.58

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.54

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

3.97

-0.89

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.80

23.53

-10.73

LRGF vs. DJUN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRGF Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the DJUN Sharpe Ratio of 2.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRGF and DJUN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRGFDJUNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.36

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

0.96

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.04

-0.34

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. DJUN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than DJUN's maximum drawdown of -11.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and DJUN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRGFDJUNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-11.96%

-24.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-3.15%

-5.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-11.96%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

-11.96%

-9.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-1.59%

-2.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

0.53%

+1.61%

Volatility

LRGF vs. DJUN - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June (DJUN) at 0.35%. This indicates that LRGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DJUN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRGFDJUNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

0.35%

+2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

3.56%

+5.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

5.04%

+7.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

8.52%

+8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

8.06%

+10.25%

LRGF vs. DJUN - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than DJUN's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRGF vs. DJUN - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while DJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DJUN
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - June
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.05%1.16%1.23%1.49%1.78%1.05%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRGF and DJUN have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRGF has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to DJUN (0.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRGF dropped -36.03% vs DJUN's -11.96%.

On 5-year performance, LRGF leads with 14.20% vs 8.14% for DJUN. On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, DJUN has been the lower-risk option at 0.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, LRGF has performed better with a 14.20% return vs 8.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for DJUN.

LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for DJUN.

LRGF tracks MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while DJUN tracks Cboe S&P 500 30% (-5% to -35%) Buffer Protect June Series Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.85% for DJUN.

DJUN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRGF and DJUN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer