PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRGF vs. BUFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRGF vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 11.29% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 4.14% return.


LRGF

1D
0.18%
1M
6.67%
YTD
11.29%
6M
11.73%
1Y
26.79%
3Y*
23.10%
5Y*
14.20%
10Y*
14.11%

BUFX

1D
-0.02%
1M
1.17%
YTD
4.14%
6M
4.86%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRGF vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LRGF and BUFX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRGF vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRGF
LRGF Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
LRGF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRGF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRGF Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
LRGF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRGF Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRGF vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LRGFBUFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.06

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.08

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.80

LRGF vs. BUFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LRGFBUFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

2.70

-2.00

Drawdowns

LRGF vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and BUFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRGFBUFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.03%

-2.87%

-33.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.02%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-0.24%

-4.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.14%

Volatility

LRGF vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRGFBUFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.04%

3.99%

+8.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.02%

3.99%

+13.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

3.99%

+14.32%

LRGF vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRGF vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison

LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFX
FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRGF
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF
1.05%1.16%1.23%1.49%1.78%1.05%1.35%1.76%3.27%1.68%1.56%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRGF and BUFX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.

LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.05%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.

LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.96% for BUFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRGF and BUFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer