LRGF vs. BUFX
LRGF (iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF) and BUFX (FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LRGF is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor, while BUFX is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LRGF charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for BUFX.
Performance
LRGF vs. BUFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a 7.84% return, which is significantly higher than BUFX's 3.84% return.
LRGF
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -0.45%
- YTD
- 7.84%
- 6M
- 6.74%
- 1Y
- 21.21%
- 3Y*
- 21.28%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- 14.05%
BUFX
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 3.84%
- 6M
- 3.89%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRGF vs. BUFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 7.84% | 11.07% |
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 3.84% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGF and BUFX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRGF vs. BUFX — Risk / Return Rank
LRGF
BUFX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LRGF vs. BUFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF (BUFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRGF | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.39 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.61 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRGF vs. BUFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than BUFX's maximum drawdown of -2.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and BUFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGF | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -2.87% | -33.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.10% | -0.59% | -2.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.53% | -0.24% | -4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.21% | — | — |
Volatility
LRGF vs. BUFX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRGF | BUFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.63% | 4.05% | +8.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.10% | 4.05% | +13.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 4.05% | +14.28% |
LRGF vs. BUFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRGF vs. BUFX - Dividend Comparison
LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while BUFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFX FT Vest Laddered Enhance & Moderate Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.10% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRGF and BUFX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LRGF is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LRGF is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.96% for BUFX.
LRGF has the higher dividend yield at 1.10%, compared with 0.00% for BUFX.
LRGF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFX is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for LRGF and 0.96% for BUFX.
Find the right allocation for LRGF and BUFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer