LRGF vs. BDGS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS).
LRGF and BDGS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LRGF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Diversified Multi-Factor. It was launched on Apr 30, 2015. BDGS is an actively managed fund by Bridges. It was launched on May 10, 2023.
Performance
LRGF vs. BDGS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LRGF vs. BDGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | -4.69% | 16.48% | 26.59% | 18.54% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | -1.41% | 10.61% | 19.07% | 8.31% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRGF achieves a -4.69% return, which is significantly lower than BDGS's -1.41% return.
LRGF
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -4.24%
- YTD
- -4.69%
- 6M
- -3.86%
- 1Y
- 15.42%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
BDGS
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- -1.14%
- YTD
- -1.41%
- 6M
- 0.11%
- 1Y
- 10.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LRGF vs. BDGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRGF has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BDGS's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LRGF vs. BDGS — Risk / Return Rank
LRGF
BDGS
LRGF vs. BDGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) and Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRGF | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.99 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.31 | 1.67 | -0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.28 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 1.80 | -0.50 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.87 | 9.34 | -3.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRGF | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.99 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.51 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between LRGF and BDGS is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LRGF vs. BDGS - Dividend Comparison
LRGF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than BDGS's 0.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRGF iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF | 1.23% | 1.16% | 1.23% | 1.49% | 1.78% | 1.05% | 1.35% | 1.76% | 3.27% | 1.68% | 1.56% | 0.83% |
BDGS Bridges Capital Tactical ETF | 0.56% | 0.55% | 1.81% | 0.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LRGF vs. BDGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRGF drawdown since its inception was -36.03%, which is greater than BDGS's maximum drawdown of -9.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRGF and BDGS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRGF | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.03% | -9.12% | -26.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.37% | -5.85% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.03% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.26% | -2.15% | -4.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.60% | -0.67% | -3.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 1.13% | +1.62% |
Volatility
LRGF vs. BDGS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Multifactor ETF (LRGF) has a higher volatility of 5.21% compared to Bridges Capital Tactical ETF (BDGS) at 3.39%. This indicates that LRGF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BDGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LRGF | BDGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.21% | 3.39% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.66% | 5.09% | +4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.48% | 10.70% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.05% | 8.35% | +8.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.30% | 8.35% | +9.95% |