LRCX vs. SITM
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and SITM (SiTime Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, SITM in Semiconductors. Over the past 5 years, LRCX returned 40.10%/yr vs 43.34%/yr for SITM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
LRCX vs. SITM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LRCX having a 89.76% return and SITM slightly lower at 88.08%.
LRCX
- 1D
- 6.98%
- 1M
- 10.34%
- YTD
- 89.76%
- 6M
- 99.61%
- 1Y
- 278.49%
- 3Y*
- 76.58%
- 5Y*
- 40.10%
- 10Y*
- 46.35%
SITM
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- -20.26%
- YTD
- 88.08%
- 6M
- 83.53%
- 1Y
- 222.72%
- 3Y*
- 81.68%
- 5Y*
- 43.34%
- 10Y*
- —
LRCX vs. SITM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 89.76% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 7.12% |
SITM SiTime Corporation | 88.08% | 64.63% | 75.73% | 20.13% | -65.26% | 161.36% | 338.94% | 96.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and SITM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2019 | 0.61 |
The correlation between LRCX and SITM shifts across timeframes, from 0.55 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$409.71B
SITM:
$17.50B
LRCX:
$5.29
SITM:
-$0.94
LRCX:
18.98
SITM:
45.11
LRCX:
38.71
SITM:
15.10
LRCX:
$21.68B
SITM:
$379.91M
LRCX:
$10.84B
SITM:
$211.60M
LRCX:
$6.10B
SITM:
-$13.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. SITM — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
SITM
LRCX vs. SITM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and SiTime Corporation (SITM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LRCX | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.34 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 1.40 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.02 | 7.33 | +6.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 47.19 | 17.94 | +29.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LRCX | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.46 | 2.94 | +2.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 0.57 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 1.03 | -0.60 |
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. SITM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than SITM's maximum drawdown of -78.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and SITM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -78.12% | -9.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -30.59% | +10.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -55.26% | +8.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -78.12% | +21.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | -26.31% | +20.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.18% | -36.81% | +8.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | 12.47% | -6.54% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. SITM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 18.51%, while SiTime Corporation (SITM) has a volatility of 22.72%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SITM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | SITM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.51% | 22.72% | -4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.13% | 55.94% | -13.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 51.52% | 76.55% | -25.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.25% | 76.29% | -30.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 80.56% | -35.80% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. SITM - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, while SITM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.31% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
SITM SiTime Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
LRCX vs. SITM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and SiTime Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. SITM - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
SITM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a gross profit of 66.96M and revenue of 113.57M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.0%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
SITM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported an operating income of -12.34M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in an operating margin of -10.9%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
SITM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SiTime Corporation reported a net income of -5.22M and revenue of 113.57M, resulting in a net margin of -4.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and SITM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SITM has higher volatility (22.72%) compared to LRCX (18.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs SITM's -78.12%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.46 vs 2.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and SITM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer