LRCX vs. FICO
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, FICO in Software - Application. Over the past 10 years, LRCX returned 48.23%/yr vs 26.62%/yr for FICO. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. FICO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than FICO's -30.25% return. Over the past 10 years, LRCX has outperformed FICO with an annualized return of 48.23%, while FICO has yielded a comparatively lower 26.62% annualized return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 28.83%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 312.75%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
FICO
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- 7.34%
- YTD
- -30.25%
- 6M
- -36.09%
- 1Y
- -33.92%
- 3Y*
- 13.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.49%
- 10Y*
- 26.62%
LRCX vs. FICO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 76.21% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -30.25% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 38.03% | -15.14% | 36.39% | 100.36% | 22.06% | 28.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and FICO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 1992 | 0.30 |
The correlation between LRCX and FICO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.39 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$463.20B
FICO:
$28.00B
LRCX:
$5.29
FICO:
$31.51
LRCX:
69.37
FICO:
37.43
LRCX:
5.25
FICO:
1.99
LRCX:
21.46
FICO:
12.60
LRCX:
$21.68B
FICO:
$2.26B
LRCX:
$10.84B
FICO:
$1.90B
LRCX:
$6.10B
FICO:
$1.16B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. FICO — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
FICO
LRCX vs. FICO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 0.90 | +0.73 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.26 | -0.65 | +15.92 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.20 | -1.24 | +52.43 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. FICO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than FICO's maximum drawdown of -79.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and FICO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -79.26% | -8.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -52.12% | +32.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -61.28% | +14.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -61.28% | +4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | -61.28% | +4.89% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -50.50% | +50.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -18.03% | -10.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 27.47% | -21.52% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. FICO - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) at 14.33%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FICO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | FICO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 14.33% | +7.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.63% | 39.21% | +4.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 50.67% | +2.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.57% | 40.73% | +5.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 38.07% | +6.85% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. FICO - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
LRCX vs. FICO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Fair Isaac Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LRCX vs. FICO - Profitability Comparison
LRCX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.91B and revenue of 5.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.8%.
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
LRCX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.05B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 35.0%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
LRCX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 1.83B and revenue of 5.84B, resulting in a net margin of 31.3%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and FICO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to FICO (14.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs FICO's -79.26%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and FICO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer