LRCX vs. FBTC
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) is a stock, while FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Over the past year, LRCX returned 303.12% vs -40.63% for FBTC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -27.39% return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 24.16%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 303.12%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
FBTC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -20.13%
- YTD
- -27.39%
- 6M
- -29.64%
- 1Y
- -40.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LRCX vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -2.67% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -27.39% | -6.56% | 94.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and FBTC is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
FBTC
LRCX vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 0.85 | +0.77 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.26 | -0.78 | +16.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.20 | -1.37 | +52.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and FBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -52.07% | -35.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -52.07% | +32.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -49.42% | +49.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -16.46% | -11.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 29.61% | -23.66% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison
Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 21.52% compared to Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) at 11.97%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 11.97% | +9.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.63% | 34.39% | +9.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 43.98% | +8.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.57% | 50.13% | -3.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 50.13% | -5.21% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and FBTC have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LRCX has higher volatility (21.52%) compared to FBTC (11.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs FBTC's -52.07%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and FBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer