LRCX vs. DFDV

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and DFDV (DeFi Development Corp) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — LRCX in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials, DFDV in Software - Infrastructure. Over the past year, LRCX returned 303.12% vs -89.20% for DFDV. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LRCX vs. DFDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and DeFi Development Corp (DFDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than DFDV's -38.61% return.

LRCX

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 24.16%
• YTD: 114.54%
• 6M: 128.79%
• 1Y: 303.12%
• 3Y*: 81.91%
• 5Y*: 43.22%
• 10Y*: 48.23%

DFDV

• 1D: 5.08%
• 1M: -33.33%
• YTD: -38.61%
• 6M: -44.24%
• 1Y: -89.20%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCX vs. DFDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	114.54%	139.16%	-6.84%	23.28%
DFDV DeFi Development Corp	-38.61%	700.93%	-41.08%	-74.25%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and DFDV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2023	0.17

The correlation between LRCX and DFDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.17 (all time) to 0.28 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LRCX : $463.20B DFDV : $81.40M
EPS LRCX : $5.29 DFDV : -$6.55
PS Ratio LRCX : 21.46 DFDV : 5.38
PB Ratio LRCX : 43.76 DFDV : 7.99
Total Revenue (TTM) LRCX : $21.68B DFDV : $13.76M
Gross Profit (TTM) LRCX : $10.84B DFDV : $13.42M
EBITDA (TTM) LRCX : $6.10B DFDV : -$117.94M

Return for Risk

LRCX vs. DFDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCX

LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 98
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 97
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 99

DFDV

DFDV Risk / Return Rank: 9
DFDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
DFDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
DFDV Omega Ratio Rank: 9
DFDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
DFDV Martin Ratio Rank: 13

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCX vs. DFDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and DeFi Development Corp (DFDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LRCX	DFDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	5.79	-0.69	+6.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.75	-1.53	+6.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.63	0.84	+0.79
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	15.26	-0.98	+16.25
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	51.20	-1.28	+52.47

LRCX vs. DFDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.79, which is higher than the DFDV Sharpe Ratio of -0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and DFDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. DFDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, smaller than the maximum DFDV drawdown of -93.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and DFDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	LRCX	DFDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.90%	-93.13%	+5.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.01%	-90.66%	+70.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-47.10%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.39%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-91.98%	+91.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-28.17%	-72.84%	+44.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.95%	70.13%	-64.18%

Volatility

LRCX vs. DFDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 21.52%, while DeFi Development Corp (DFDV) has a volatility of 28.47%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LRCX	DFDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.52%	28.47%	-6.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.63%	84.19%	-40.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.78%	131.72%	-78.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	46.57%	518.02%	-471.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.92%	518.02%	-473.10%

Dividends

LRCX vs. DFDV - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while DFDV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DFDV DeFi Development Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LRCX Lam Research Corporation	0.28%	0.57%	1.19%	0.95%	1.53%	0.78%	1.04%	1.54%	2.79%	1.01%	1.28%	1.36%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LRCX and DFDV in my portfolio?

LRCX and DFDV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LRCX or DFDV?

DFDV has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to LRCX (21.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs DFDV's -93.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.