DFDV vs. QBTS
DFDV (DeFi Development Corp) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — DFDV in Software - Infrastructure, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past year, DFDV returned -83.23% vs 55.83% for QBTS. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
DFDV vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, DFDV achieves a -40.30% return, which is significantly lower than QBTS's 5.35% return.
DFDV
- 1D
- -8.36%
- 1M
- -29.06%
- YTD
- -40.30%
- 6M
- -57.83%
- 1Y
- -83.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -7.89%
- 1M
- 31.69%
- YTD
- 5.35%
- 6M
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 55.83%
- 3Y*
- 162.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFDV vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
DFDV DeFi Development Corp | -40.30% | 700.93% | -41.08% | -73.04% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | 5.35% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -61.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between DFDV and QBTS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2023 | 0.21 |
The correlation between DFDV and QBTS shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
DFDV:
$79.17M
QBTS:
$10.12B
DFDV:
-$6.55
QBTS:
-$1.08
DFDV:
5.23
QBTS:
751.08
DFDV:
7.77
QBTS:
9.00
DFDV:
$13.76M
QBTS:
$12.44M
DFDV:
$13.42M
QBTS:
$8.25M
DFDV:
-$117.94M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
DFDV vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
DFDV
QBTS
DFDV vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DeFi Development Corp (DFDV) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| DFDV | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.17 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.93 | 0.79 | -1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | 1.39 | -2.61 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| DFDV | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.60 | 0.52 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.02 | 0.20 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
DFDV vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum DFDV drawdown since its inception was -92.25%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DFDV and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| DFDV | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -92.25% | -96.67% | +4.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -89.56% | -71.01% | -18.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -79.17% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -92.20% | -38.48% | -53.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.11% | -65.87% | -6.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 68.54% | 40.23% | +28.31% |
Volatility
DFDV vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for DeFi Development Corp (DFDV) is 25.31%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 41.14%. This indicates that DFDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| DFDV | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.31% | 41.14% | -15.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.96% | 77.15% | +6.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 138.64% | 108.14% | +30.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 520.77% | 151.20% | +369.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 520.77% | 151.20% | +369.57% |
Dividends
DFDV vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither DFDV nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
DFDV vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between DeFi Development Corp and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
DFDV and QBTS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (41.14%) compared to DFDV (25.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DFDV dropped -92.25% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for DFDV and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer