LRCX vs. CELC
LRCX (Lam Research Corporation) and CELC (Celcuity Inc.) are both stocks. LRCX operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while CELC operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare). Over the past 5 years, LRCX returned 43.22%/yr vs 26.91%/yr for CELC. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LRCX vs. CELC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 114.54% return, which is significantly higher than CELC's -11.22% return.
LRCX
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 22.62%
- YTD
- 114.54%
- 6M
- 128.79%
- 1Y
- 312.75%
- 3Y*
- 81.91%
- 5Y*
- 43.22%
- 10Y*
- 48.23%
CELC
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -34.27%
- YTD
- -11.22%
- 6M
- -15.87%
- 1Y
- 631.21%
- 3Y*
- 101.65%
- 5Y*
- 26.91%
- 10Y*
- —
LRCX vs. CELC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 114.54% | 139.16% | -6.84% | 88.63% | -40.72% | 53.66% | 64.18% | 119.33% | -24.40% | 4.21% |
CELC Celcuity Inc. | -11.22% | 661.96% | -10.16% | 4.00% | 6.22% | 44.00% | -13.91% | -55.65% | 26.60% | 53.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCX and CELC is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2017 | 0.15 |
Fundamentals
LRCX:
$463.20B
CELC:
$4.82B
LRCX:
$5.29
CELC:
-$3.95
LRCX:
43.76
CELC:
90.10
LRCX:
$21.68B
CELC:
$0.00
LRCX:
$10.84B
CELC:
-$41.00K
LRCX:
$6.10B
CELC:
-$168.13M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCX vs. CELC — Risk / Return Rank
LRCX
CELC
LRCX vs. CELC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and Celcuity Inc. (CELC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCX | CELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.90 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 15.26 | 15.38 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 51.20 | 57.19 | -5.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCX vs. CELC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, roughly equal to the maximum CELC drawdown of -85.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and CELC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCX | CELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.90% | -85.64% | -2.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.01% | -39.70% | +19.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -47.10% | -61.99% | +14.89% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -56.39% | -82.70% | +26.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.39% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -38.92% | +38.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -44.97% | +16.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.95% | 10.67% | -4.72% |
Volatility
LRCX vs. CELC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) is 21.52%, while Celcuity Inc. (CELC) has a volatility of 34.72%. This indicates that LRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CELC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCX | CELC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.52% | 34.72% | -13.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.63% | 49.86% | -6.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.78% | 182.45% | -129.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 46.57% | 101.49% | -54.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.92% | 91.68% | -46.76% |
Dividends
LRCX vs. CELC - Dividend Comparison
LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, while CELC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELC Celcuity Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LRCX Lam Research Corporation | 0.28% | 0.57% | 1.19% | 0.95% | 1.53% | 0.78% | 1.04% | 1.54% | 2.79% | 1.01% | 1.28% | 1.36% |
Financials
LRCX vs. CELC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and Celcuity Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCX and CELC have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CELC has higher volatility (34.72%) compared to LRCX (21.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs CELC's -85.64%.
LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.79 vs 3.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LRCX and CELC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer