CELC vs. BW
CELC (Celcuity Inc.) and BW (Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.) are both stocks. CELC operates in Diagnostics & Research (Healthcare), while BW operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, CELC returned 34.40%/yr vs 5.96%/yr for BW. Their 0.18 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
CELC vs. BW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CELC achieves a -13.39% return, which is significantly lower than BW's 50.81% return.
CELC
- 1D
- -1.44%
- 1M
- -19.98%
- 6M
- -21.06%
- YTD
- -13.39%
- 1Y
- 116.44%
- 3Y*
- 105.46%
- 5Y*
- 34.40%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 24.55%
BW
- 1D
- -1.58%
- 1M
- -20.61%
- 6M
- -0.81%
- YTD
- 50.81%
- 1Y
- 925.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.98%
- 5Y*
- 5.96%
- 10Y*
- -24.05%
- ALL TIME*
- -23.82%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $29.60M | $37.10M | $59.24M | |
CELC Celcuity Inc. | $119.16M | $168.28M | $170.21M |
CELC vs. BW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CELC Celcuity Inc. | -13.39% | 661.96% | -10.16% | 4.00% | 6.22% | 44.00% | -13.91% | -55.65% | 26.60% | 53.44% |
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 50.81% | 286.59% | 12.33% | -74.70% | -36.03% | 156.98% | -3.57% | -6.76% | -93.13% | 63.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between CELC and BW is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2017 | 0.18 |
Fundamentals
CELC:
$4.21B
BW:
$1.07B
CELC:
-$3.81
BW:
-$0.79
CELC:
$0.00
BW:
$668.48M
CELC:
-$41.00K
BW:
$121.68M
CELC:
-$168.13M
BW:
-$41.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CELC vs. BW — Risk / Return Rank
CELC
BW
CELC vs. BW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celcuity Inc. (CELC) and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CELC | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.53 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 14.26 | -11.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.33 | 44.23 | -36.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CELC vs. BW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CELC drawdown since its inception was -85.64%, smaller than the maximum BW drawdown of -99.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CELC and BW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CELC | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.64% | -99.89% | +14.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.25% | -62.72% | +19.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.99% | -95.33% | +33.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.32% | -97.39% | +21.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -40.42% | -95.96% | +55.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.81% | -82.94% | +38.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.51% | 20.18% | -3.67% |
Volatility
CELC vs. BW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Celcuity Inc. (CELC) is 26.36%, while Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. (BW) has a volatility of 31.34%. This indicates that CELC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CELC | BW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.36% | 31.34% | -4.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 54.17% | 88.95% | -34.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 76.79% | 130.11% | -53.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 101.04% | 111.10% | -10.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 91.43% | 108.62% | -17.19% |
Dividends
CELC vs. BW - Dividend Comparison
CELC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
BW Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc. | 4.36% |
CELC Celcuity Inc. | 0.00% |
Financials
CELC vs. BW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celcuity Inc. and Babcock & Wilcox Enterprises, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CELC and BW have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BW has higher volatility (31.34%) compared to CELC (26.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CELC dropped -85.64% vs BW's -99.89%.
BW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.89 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CELC and BW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer