PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCX vs. BBIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LRCX vs. BBIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCX achieves a 71.50% return, which is significantly higher than BBIO's 4.71% return.


LRCX

1D
-1.58%
1M
-25.11%
6M
25.75%
YTD
71.50%
1Y
210.67%
3Y*
61.40%
5Y*
37.09%
10Y*
43.64%
ALL TIME*
23.67%

BBIO

1D
-2.50%
1M
7.47%
6M
3.65%
YTD
4.71%
1Y
69.43%
3Y*
32.71%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$163.36M$283.28M$252.33M
$3.65B$3.82B$3.92B

LRCX vs. BBIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
71.50%139.16%-6.84%88.63%-40.72%53.66%64.18%62.81%
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
4.71%178.75%-32.03%429.79%-54.32%-76.54%102.88%14.51%

Correlation

The correlation between LRCX and BBIO is 0.29, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.29

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2019

0.28

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LRCX:

$366.44B

BBIO:

$15.69B

EPS

LRCX:

$5.75

BBIO:

-$3.74

PS Ratio

LRCX:

15.93

BBIO:

27.48

Total Revenue (TTM)

LRCX:

$23.23B

BBIO:

$566.04M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LRCX:

$11.73B

BBIO:

$538.20M

EBITDA (TTM)

LRCX:

$8.70B

BBIO:

-$602.24M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCX vs. BBIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

LRCX
LRCX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
LRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
LRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

BBIO
BBIO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

LRCX vs. BBIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRCXBBIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.28

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.08

3.45

+1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

21.44

7.74

+13.70

LRCX vs. BBIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LRCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is higher than the BBIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LRCX and BBIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRCX vs. BBIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCX drawdown since its inception was -87.90%, smaller than the maximum BBIO drawdown of -92.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCX and BBIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCXBBIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.90%

-92.80%

+4.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.76%

-20.25%

-21.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-47.10%

-49.08%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.39%

-90.72%

+34.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.38%

-11.18%

-21.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.13%

-45.08%

+16.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.87%

9.00%

+0.87%

Volatility

LRCX vs. BBIO - Volatility Comparison

Lam Research Corporation (LRCX) has a higher volatility of 27.34% compared to BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) at 17.23%. This indicates that LRCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCXBBIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

27.34%

17.23%

+10.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.39%

37.06%

+15.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

63.10%

48.65%

+14.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

48.97%

86.05%

-37.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.20%

83.29%

-37.09%

Dividends

LRCX vs. BBIO - Dividend Comparison

LRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, while BBIO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LRCX
Lam Research Corporation
0.35%0.57%1.19%0.95%1.53%0.78%1.04%1.54%2.79%1.01%1.28%1.36%

Financials

LRCX vs. BBIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lam Research Corporation and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

LRCX vs. BBIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lam Research Corporation and BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

LRCX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a gross profit of 3.48B and revenue of 6.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

BBIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 178.39M and revenue of 180.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.

LRCX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported an operating income of 2.51B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.4%.

BBIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -105.96M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in an operating margin of -58.7%.

LRCX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lam Research Corporation reported a net income of 2.28B and revenue of 6.72B, resulting in a net margin of 33.9%.

BBIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a net income of -164.04M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in a net margin of -90.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LRCX and BBIO have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LRCX has higher volatility (27.34%) compared to BBIO (17.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LRCX dropped -87.90% vs BBIO's -92.80%.

LRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCX and BBIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer