PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BBIO vs. TEVA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

BBIO vs. TEVA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BBIO achieves a -11.98% return, which is significantly lower than TEVA's 10.32% return.


BBIO

1D
2.83%
1M
-2.11%
YTD
-11.98%
6M
-9.94%
1Y
77.09%
3Y*
66.45%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*

TEVA

1D
4.87%
1M
-3.99%
YTD
10.32%
6M
21.19%
1Y
96.52%
3Y*
68.40%
5Y*
27.05%
10Y*
-4.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BBIO vs. TEVA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
-11.98%178.75%-32.03%429.79%-54.32%-76.54%102.88%27.22%
TEVA
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
10.32%41.61%111.11%14.47%13.86%-16.99%-1.53%7.93%

Correlation

The correlation between BBIO and TEVA is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019

0.27

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BBIO:

$13.12B

TEVA:

$40.59B

EPS

BBIO:

-$3.76

TEVA:

$1.34

PS Ratio

BBIO:

22.99

TEVA:

2.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

BBIO:

$566.04M

TEVA:

$17.35B

Gross Profit (TTM)

BBIO:

$538.20M

TEVA:

$9.03B

EBITDA (TTM)

BBIO:

-$602.24M

TEVA:

$3.05B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BBIO vs. TEVA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BBIO
BBIO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BBIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
BBIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

TEVA
TEVA Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
TEVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TEVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TEVA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TEVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TEVA Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BBIO vs. TEVA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


BBIOTEVADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.47

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.83

4.45

-0.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.72

12.15

-2.43

BBIO vs. TEVA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BBIO Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is lower than the TEVA Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BBIO and TEVA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


BBIOTEVADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.49

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.63

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.32

-0.15

Drawdowns

BBIO vs. TEVA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BBIO drawdown since its inception was -92.80%, roughly equal to the maximum TEVA drawdown of -90.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BBIO and TEVA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BBIOTEVADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.80%

-90.89%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.25%

-21.79%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.08%

-43.70%

-5.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-91.89%

-43.70%

-48.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-88.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.74%

-49.11%

+33.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.84%

-32.00%

-13.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.95%

7.97%

-0.02%

Volatility

BBIO vs. TEVA - Volatility Comparison

BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. (BBIO) has a higher volatility of 12.16% compared to Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited (TEVA) at 8.99%. This indicates that BBIO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TEVA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BBIOTEVADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.16%

8.99%

+3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.62%

23.65%

+10.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.67%

38.94%

+7.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

86.00%

42.95%

+43.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

83.85%

47.32%

+36.53%

Dividends

BBIO vs. TEVA - Dividend Comparison

Neither BBIO nor TEVA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBIO
BridgeBio Pharma, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TEVA
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.88%3.19%1.77%

Financials

BBIO vs. TEVA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
180.60M
3.98B
(BBIO) Total Revenue
(TEVA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

BBIO vs. TEVA - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. and Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.8%
49.5%
Portfolio components
BBIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 178.39M and revenue of 180.60M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.8%.

TEVA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited reported a gross profit of 1.97B and revenue of 3.98B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.5%.

BBIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported an operating income of -105.96M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in an operating margin of -58.7%.

TEVA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

BBIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, BridgeBio Pharma, Inc. reported a net income of -164.04M and revenue of 180.60M, resulting in a net margin of -90.8%.

TEVA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Limited reported a net income of 369.00M and revenue of 3.98B, resulting in a net margin of 9.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


BBIO and TEVA have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BBIO has higher volatility (12.16%) compared to TEVA (8.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BBIO dropped -92.80% vs TEVA's -90.89%.

TEVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BBIO and TEVA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer