PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LRCU vs. FDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LRCU vs. FDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 268.21% return, which is significantly higher than FDT's 23.23% return.


LRCU

1D
1.75%
1M
57.23%
YTD
268.21%
6M
315.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FDT

1D
0.21%
1M
0.87%
YTD
23.23%
6M
24.33%
1Y
50.01%
3Y*
27.84%
5Y*
12.16%
10Y*
11.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LRCU vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between LRCU and FDT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.64

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LRCU vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LRCU

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FDT
FDT Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDT Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDT Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LRCU vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LRCUFDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.01

LRCU vs. FDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LRCU vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and FDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LRCUFDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.09%

-46.10%

+6.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.37%

+3.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-10.76%

+1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

Volatility

LRCU vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LRCUFDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

113.97%

19.59%

+94.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

113.97%

18.46%

+95.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

113.97%

18.62%

+95.35%

LRCU vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

LRCU vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison

LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDT
First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund
2.89%3.27%3.89%4.36%2.29%3.80%2.42%2.78%2.13%1.57%1.76%1.83%
LRCU
Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LRCU and FDT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FDT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FDT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.

FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.

LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.80% for FDT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LRCU and FDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer