LRCU vs. FDT
LRCU (Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF) and FDT (First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - LRCU is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr, while FDT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX DM Ex-US Index. LRCU is actively managed, while FDT is passively managed. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LRCU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FDT.
Performance
LRCU vs. FDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LRCU achieves a 268.21% return, which is significantly higher than FDT's 23.23% return.
LRCU
- 1D
- 1.75%
- 1M
- 57.23%
- YTD
- 268.21%
- 6M
- 315.13%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FDT
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.87%
- YTD
- 23.23%
- 6M
- 24.33%
- 1Y
- 50.01%
- 3Y*
- 27.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.16%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
LRCU vs. FDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 268.21% | 172.36% |
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 23.23% | 10.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between LRCU and FDT is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LRCU vs. FDT — Risk / Return Rank
LRCU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FDT
LRCU vs. FDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF (LRCU) and First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund (FDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LRCU | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.70 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 14.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LRCU vs. FDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LRCU drawdown since its inception was -40.09%, smaller than the maximum FDT drawdown of -46.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LRCU and FDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LRCU | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.09% | -46.10% | +6.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -14.29% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.80% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.10% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.37% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.34% | -10.76% | +1.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.54% | — |
Volatility
LRCU vs. FDT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LRCU | FDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 8.93% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 17.27% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 113.97% | 19.59% | +94.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 113.97% | 18.46% | +95.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 113.97% | 18.62% | +95.35% |
LRCU vs. FDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
LRCU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FDT's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
LRCU vs. FDT - Dividend Comparison
LRCU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FDT First Trust Developed Markets ex-US AlphaDEX Fund | 2.89% | 3.27% | 3.89% | 4.36% | 2.29% | 3.80% | 2.42% | 2.78% | 2.13% | 1.57% | 1.76% | 1.83% |
LRCU Tradr 2X Long LRCX Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LRCU and FDT have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FDT is cheaper at 0.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FDT is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for LRCU.
FDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.89%, compared with 0.00% for LRCU.
LRCU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while FDT is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: Tradr and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for LRCU and 0.80% for FDT.
Find the right allocation for LRCU and FDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer