PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQQ.PA vs. UYG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) and ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

LQQ.PA is traded in EUR, while UYG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UYG values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQQ.PA achieves a 40.35% return, which is significantly higher than UYG's -5.99% return.


LQQ.PA

1D
5.42%
1M
8.04%
YTD
40.35%
6M
42.90%
1Y
81.16%
3Y*
42.81%
5Y*
10Y*

UYG

1D
0.47%
1M
9.27%
YTD
-5.99%
6M
-6.26%
1Y
9.06%
3Y*
26.23%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*
17.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage
40.35%14.16%57.00%75.85%
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
-5.99%5.56%65.99%19.59%

Correlation

The correlation between LQQ.PA and UYG is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2023

0.22

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQQ.PA vs. UYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQQ.PA
LQQ.PA Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQQ.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

UYG
UYG Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
UYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
UYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
UYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) and ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LQQ.PAUYGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.08

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

0.33

+3.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.21

0.75

+10.45

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQQ.PA Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is higher than the UYG Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQQ.PA and UYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQQ.PA drawdown since its inception was -44.66%, smaller than the maximum UYG drawdown of -97.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQQ.PA and UYG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQQ.PAUYGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.66%

-97.27%

+52.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.88%

-27.80%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.66%

-33.88%

-10.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-41.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-13.71%

+12.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.19%

-55.02%

+47.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

12.03%

-4.86%

Volatility

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Volatility Comparison

Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) has a higher volatility of 12.35% compared to ProShares Ultra Financials (UYG) at 7.97%. This indicates that LQQ.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQQ.PAUYGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.35%

7.97%

+4.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.49%

22.19%

+2.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.04%

29.06%

+2.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.49%

35.40%

+0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.49%

40.92%

-5.43%

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LQQ.PA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than UYG's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

LQQ.PA vs. UYG - Dividend Comparison

LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.59%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LQQ.PA
Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UYG
ProShares Ultra Financials
12.59%11.72%0.51%0.79%0.77%9.39%0.66%0.90%1.28%0.56%0.76%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


LQQ.PA and UYG have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LQQ.PA is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LQQ.PA is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UYG.

LQQ.PA is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while UYG is Leveraged Equities. LQQ.PA tracks Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index, while UYG tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for LQQ.PA and 0.95% for UYG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQQ.PA and UYG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer