LQQ.PA vs. QLD
Compare and contrast key facts about Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD).
LQQ.PA and QLD are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LQQ.PA is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100® Leverage (2x) index. It was launched on Jun 27, 2006. QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. Both LQQ.PA and QLD are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LQQ.PA or QLD.
Key characteristics
| LQQ.PA | QLD | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 52.65% | 45.15% |
| 1Y Return | 71.21% | 70.07% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 10.82% | 8.00% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 33.29% | 32.46% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 30.98% | 29.55% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.11 | 1.99 |
| Sortino Ratio | 2.61 | 2.47 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.36 | 1.33 |
| Calmar Ratio | 2.71 | 2.36 |
| Martin Ratio | 8.45 | 8.62 |
| Ulcer Index | 8.07% | 8.01% |
| Daily Std Dev | 32.22% | 34.69% |
| Max Drawdown | -75.86% | -83.13% |
| Current Drawdown | 0.00% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQQ.PA and QLD is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LQQ.PA vs. QLD - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LQQ.PA achieves a 52.65% return, which is significantly higher than QLD's 45.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LQQ.PA having a 30.98% annualized return and QLD not far behind at 29.55%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LQQ.PA vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQQ.PA has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LQQ.PA vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LQQ.PA vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison
LQQ.PA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQQ.PA Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.26% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.90% | 0.11% | 0.19% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
LQQ.PA vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQQ.PA drawdown since its inception was -75.86%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQQ.PA and QLD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LQQ.PA vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor UCITS NASDAQ-100 Daily Leverage (LQQ.PA) is 9.46%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that LQQ.PA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.