LQDH vs. PCL
LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and PCL (PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.25% expense ratio.
Performance
LQDH vs. PCL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with LQDH having a 2.34% return and PCL slightly lower at 2.29%.
LQDH
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 7.31%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- 5.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.69%
PCL
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 2.27%
- YTD
- 2.29%
- 6M
- 2.37%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQDH vs. PCL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.34% | 3.41% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 2.29% | 2.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDH and PCL is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDH vs. PCL — Risk / Return Rank
LQDH
PCL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LQDH vs. PCL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF (PCL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQDH | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.54 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. PCL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than PCL's maximum drawdown of -5.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and PCL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDH | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -5.14% | -19.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.68% | +0.47% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.67% | -1.73% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | — | — |
Volatility
LQDH vs. PCL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDH | PCL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.49% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68% | 7.85% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 7.85% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 7.85% | -1.41% |
LQDH vs. PCL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both LQDH and PCL have an expense ratio of 0.25%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDH vs. PCL - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than PCL's 5.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
PCL PGIM Corporate Bond 10+ Year ETF | 5.26% | 2.52% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDH and PCL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.25% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQDH and PCL have the same expense ratio: 0.25% per year.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 5.26% for PCL.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and PGIM.
Find the right allocation for LQDH and PCL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer