LQDH vs. FLRN
LQDH (iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF) and FLRN (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. LQDH is actively managed, while FLRN is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, LQDH returned 4.64%/yr vs 3.03%/yr for FLRN. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LQDH charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FLRN.
Performance
LQDH vs. FLRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDH achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly higher than FLRN's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, LQDH has outperformed FLRN with an annualized return of 4.64%, while FLRN has yielded a comparatively lower 3.03% annualized return.
LQDH
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 3.11%
- 1Y
- 7.62%
- 3Y*
- 8.08%
- 5Y*
- 5.28%
- 10Y*
- 4.64%
FLRN
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 2.19%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 5.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.19%
- 10Y*
- 3.03%
LQDH vs. FLRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 2.31% | 7.00% | 7.43% | 11.14% | -1.88% | 1.84% | 1.68% | 9.50% | -2.20% | 6.00% |
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.87% | 5.01% | 6.32% | 6.54% | 1.31% | 0.39% | 0.77% | 4.02% | 1.39% | 1.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDH and FLRN is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2014 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDH vs. FLRN — Risk / Return Rank
LQDH
FLRN
LQDH vs. FLRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) and SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQDH | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 3.44 | -1.87 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.26 | 21.54 | -18.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.85 | 130.06 | -116.21 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQDH | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.83 | 7.18 | -4.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.20 | 2.50 | -1.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.72 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.50 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
LQDH vs. FLRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDH drawdown since its inception was -24.63%, which is greater than FLRN's maximum drawdown of -14.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDH and FLRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDH | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.63% | -14.64% | -9.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.34% | -0.23% | -2.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.86% | -1.43% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.08% | -2.16% | -4.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.63% | -14.64% | -9.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | 0.00% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.68% | -1.83% | +0.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.04% | +0.51% |
Volatility
LQDH vs. FLRN - Volatility Comparison
iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF (LQDH) has a higher volatility of 0.50% compared to SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLRN) at 0.15%. This indicates that LQDH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLRN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDH | FLRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.50% | 0.15% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.03% | 0.52% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70% | 0.68% | +2.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 1.69% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.44% | 4.20% | +2.24% |
LQDH vs. FLRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQDH has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FLRN's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
LQDH vs. FLRN - Dividend Comparison
LQDH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than FLRN's 4.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLRN SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.51% | 4.89% | 5.67% | 5.68% | 1.95% | 0.39% | 1.22% | 2.76% | 2.39% | 1.64% | 1.06% | 0.63% |
LQDH iShares Interest Rate Hedged Corporate Bond ETF | 5.95% | 6.06% | 7.57% | 7.69% | 3.73% | 1.65% | 2.22% | 3.09% | 5.08% | 2.37% | 2.33% | 2.98% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDH and FLRN have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LQDH has higher volatility (0.50%) compared to FLRN (0.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDH dropped -24.63% vs FLRN's -14.64%.
On 10-year performance, LQDH leads with 4.64% vs 3.03% for FLRN. On fees, FLRN is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FLRN has been the lower-risk option at 0.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, LQDH has performed better with a 4.64% return vs 3.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLRN is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for LQDH.
LQDH has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 4.51% for FLRN.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for LQDH and 0.15% for FLRN.
FLRN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.18 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDH and FLRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer