PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDA vs. UI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LQDA vs. UI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and Ubiquiti Inc. (UI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 85.27% return, which is significantly higher than UI's 3.76% return.


LQDA

1D
3.31%
1M
51.06%
YTD
85.27%
6M
82.52%
1Y
252.26%
3Y*
96.59%
5Y*
87.74%
10Y*

UI

1D
0.96%
1M
-31.90%
YTD
3.76%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
40.95%
3Y*
51.97%
5Y*
13.77%
10Y*
31.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDA vs. UI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
85.27%193.28%-2.24%88.85%30.80%65.08%-30.99%-80.26%95.14%
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
3.76%67.72%141.15%-48.23%-9.99%10.83%48.49%91.65%15.67%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and UI is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.17

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDA:

$6.46B

UI:

$34.69B

EPS

LQDA:

$0.24

UI:

$15.56

PE Ratio

LQDA:

267.21

UI:

36.82

PS Ratio

LQDA:

20.69

UI:

11.20

PB Ratio

LQDA:

59.51

UI:

28.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDA:

$288.07M

UI:

$3.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDA:

$275.77M

UI:

$1.42B

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDA:

$51.53M

UI:

$1.12B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDA vs. UI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDA
LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

UI
UI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
UI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
UI Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
UI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
UI Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDA vs. UI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and Ubiquiti Inc. (UI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDAUIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.18

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.12

0.86

+6.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

2.13

+13.76

LQDA vs. UI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is higher than the UI Sharpe Ratio of 0.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and UI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDAUIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74

0.66

+3.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

0.28

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.54

-0.24

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. UI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than UI's maximum drawdown of -77.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and UI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDAUIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.87%

-77.49%

-16.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.66%

-47.62%

+11.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-47.62%

+0.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

-69.44%

+14.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-47.12%

+47.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.65%

-26.53%

-43.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

19.31%

-3.26%

Volatility

LQDA vs. UI - Volatility Comparison

Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a higher volatility of 28.47% compared to Ubiquiti Inc. (UI) at 18.36%. This indicates that LQDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDAUIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.47%

18.36%

+10.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.97%

39.92%

+8.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.06%

62.06%

+6.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.62%

48.63%

+24.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.75%

47.98%

+37.77%

Dividends

LQDA vs. UI - Dividend Comparison

LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UI
Ubiquiti Inc.
0.56%0.51%0.72%1.72%0.88%0.65%0.50%0.58%0.50%

Financials

LQDA vs. UI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidia Corporation and Ubiquiti Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M20222023202420252026
132.87M
788.20M
(LQDA) Total Revenue
(UI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LQDA vs. UI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liquidia Corporation and Ubiquiti Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.4%
47.0%
Portfolio components
LQDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.

UI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a gross profit of 370.71M and revenue of 788.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.0%.

LQDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

UI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported an operating income of 290.82M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.9%.

LQDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.

UI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ubiquiti Inc. reported a net income of 233.91M and revenue of 788.20M, resulting in a net margin of 29.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LQDA and UI have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQDA has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to UI (18.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs UI's -77.49%.

LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQDA and UI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer