PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LQDA vs. NVT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LQDA vs. NVT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 85.27% return, which is significantly higher than NVT's 61.19% return.


LQDA

1D
3.31%
1M
51.06%
YTD
85.27%
6M
82.52%
1Y
252.26%
3Y*
96.59%
5Y*
87.74%
10Y*

NVT

1D
0.58%
1M
-3.61%
YTD
61.19%
6M
53.45%
1Y
142.75%
3Y*
52.77%
5Y*
40.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LQDA vs. NVT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
85.27%193.28%-2.24%88.85%30.80%65.08%-30.99%-80.26%95.14%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
61.19%51.27%16.63%55.98%3.32%67.15%-5.68%17.24%-16.32%

Correlation

The correlation between LQDA and NVT is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2018

0.16

The correlation between LQDA and NVT shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LQDA:

$6.46B

NVT:

$26.86B

EPS

LQDA:

$0.24

NVT:

$3.00

PE Ratio

LQDA:

267.21

NVT:

54.65

PS Ratio

LQDA:

20.69

NVT:

6.21

PB Ratio

LQDA:

59.51

NVT:

7.08

Total Revenue (TTM)

LQDA:

$288.07M

NVT:

$4.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LQDA:

$275.77M

NVT:

$1.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

LQDA:

$51.53M

NVT:

$857.60M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LQDA vs. NVT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LQDA
LQDA Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
LQDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LQDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
LQDA Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
LQDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
LQDA Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

NVT
NVT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
NVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
NVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVT Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LQDA vs. NVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and nVent Electric plc (NVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LQDANVTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.12

8.48

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.88

29.48

-13.60

LQDA vs. NVT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LQDA Sharpe Ratio is 3.74, which is comparable to the NVT Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LQDA and NVT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LQDANVTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.74

3.53

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.20

1.13

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.79

-0.50

Drawdowns

LQDA vs. NVT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than NVT's maximum drawdown of -56.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and NVT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LQDANVTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.87%

-56.18%

-37.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.66%

-16.93%

-18.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.80%

-46.67%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-55.36%

-46.67%

-8.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-7.13%

+7.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.65%

-11.83%

-57.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.05%

4.86%

+11.19%

Volatility

LQDA vs. NVT - Volatility Comparison

Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) has a higher volatility of 28.47% compared to nVent Electric plc (NVT) at 11.44%. This indicates that LQDA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LQDANVTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.47%

11.44%

+17.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.97%

31.94%

+16.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

68.06%

40.76%

+27.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

73.62%

35.96%

+37.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

85.75%

38.38%

+47.37%

Dividends

LQDA vs. NVT - Dividend Comparison

LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
LQDA
Liquidia Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NVT
nVent Electric plc
0.50%0.78%1.12%1.18%1.82%1.84%3.01%2.74%1.56%

Financials

LQDA vs. NVT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidia Corporation and nVent Electric plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B20222023202420252026
132.87M
1.24B
(LQDA) Total Revenue
(NVT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LQDA vs. NVT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Liquidia Corporation and nVent Electric plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
99.4%
35.9%
Portfolio components
LQDA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.

NVT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a gross profit of 445.60M and revenue of 1.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.9%.

LQDA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.

NVT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported an operating income of 195.70M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 15.8%.

LQDA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.

NVT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, nVent Electric plc reported a net income of 142.40M and revenue of 1.24B, resulting in a net margin of 11.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LQDA and NVT have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LQDA has higher volatility (28.47%) compared to NVT (11.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs NVT's -56.18%.

LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LQDA and NVT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer