LQDA vs. MTSI
LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) and MTSI (MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MTSI operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LQDA returned 92.14%/yr vs 44.69%/yr for MTSI. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LQDA vs. MTSI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 106.52% return, which is significantly lower than MTSI's 121.78% return.
LQDA
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 25.12%
- YTD
- 106.52%
- 6M
- 113.39%
- 1Y
- 405.18%
- 3Y*
- 105.40%
- 5Y*
- 92.14%
- 10Y*
- —
MTSI
- 1D
- 1.36%
- 1M
- 1.14%
- YTD
- 121.78%
- 6M
- 114.19%
- 1Y
- 194.54%
- 3Y*
- 82.85%
- 5Y*
- 44.69%
- 10Y*
- 26.08%
LQDA vs. MTSI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 106.52% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | -80.26% | 73.98% |
MTSI MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. | 121.78% | 31.85% | 39.76% | 47.59% | -19.57% | 42.26% | 106.92% | 83.32% | -35.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDA and MTSI is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.19 |
The correlation between LQDA and MTSI shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LQDA:
$7.20B
MTSI:
$29.30B
LQDA:
$0.24
MTSI:
$2.33
LQDA:
297.86
MTSI:
163.18
LQDA:
23.06
MTSI:
26.86
LQDA:
66.33
MTSI:
20.67
LQDA:
$288.07M
MTSI:
$1.07B
LQDA:
$275.77M
MTSI:
$594.25M
LQDA:
$51.53M
MTSI:
$245.21M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDA vs. MTSI — Risk / Return Rank
LQDA
MTSI
LQDA vs. MTSI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQDA | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.61 | 1.49 | +0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 11.11 | 9.54 | +1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 28.59 | 24.62 | +3.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQDA vs. MTSI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than MTSI's maximum drawdown of -80.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and MTSI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDA | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.87% | -80.78% | -13.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.66% | -19.74% | -15.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.80% | -41.09% | -5.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.36% | -44.86% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -80.78% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.55% | -7.28% | +6.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.53% | -26.20% | -43.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.91% | 7.64% | +6.27% |
Volatility
LQDA vs. MTSI - Volatility Comparison
Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) have volatilities of 19.43% and 20.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDA | MTSI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.43% | 20.31% | -0.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.44% | 40.72% | +7.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 65.96% | 50.86% | +15.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.71% | 43.70% | +30.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.80% | 52.43% | +33.37% |
Dividends
LQDA vs. MTSI - Dividend Comparison
Neither LQDA nor MTSI has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
LQDA vs. MTSI - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidia Corporation and MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LQDA vs. MTSI - Profitability Comparison
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
MTSI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 164.43M and revenue of 288.96M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.9%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
MTSI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 50.83M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
MTSI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 46.33M and revenue of 288.96M, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDA and MTSI have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MTSI has higher volatility (20.31%) compared to LQDA (19.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs MTSI's -80.78%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.01 vs 3.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDA and MTSI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer