LQDA vs. MPWR
LQDA (Liquidia Corporation) and MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. LQDA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while MPWR operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 5 years, LQDA returned 93.12%/yr vs 30.08%/yr for MPWR. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LQDA vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LQDA achieves a 126.65% return, which is significantly higher than MPWR's 45.19% return.
LQDA
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 26.37%
- YTD
- 126.65%
- 6M
- 127.17%
- 1Y
- 496.72%
- 3Y*
- 106.17%
- 5Y*
- 93.12%
- 10Y*
- —
MPWR
- 1D
- -8.69%
- 1M
- -16.15%
- YTD
- 45.19%
- 6M
- 39.29%
- 1Y
- 79.79%
- 3Y*
- 36.12%
- 5Y*
- 30.08%
- 10Y*
- 35.87%
LQDA vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 126.65% | 193.28% | -2.24% | 88.85% | 30.80% | 65.08% | -30.99% | -80.26% | 73.98% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 45.19% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | -13.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LQDA and MPWR is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.21 |
The correlation between LQDA and MPWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LQDA:
$7.90B
MPWR:
$64.67B
LQDA:
$0.24
MPWR:
$13.89
LQDA:
326.88
MPWR:
94.54
LQDA:
25.31
MPWR:
21.59
LQDA:
72.79
MPWR:
17.59
LQDA:
$288.07M
MPWR:
$2.96B
LQDA:
$275.77M
MPWR:
$1.63B
LQDA:
$51.53M
MPWR:
$861.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQDA vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank
LQDA
MPWR
LQDA vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LQDA | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +6.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.70 | 1.27 | +0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.40 | 3.58 | +10.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 37.45 | 9.12 | +28.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LQDA vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQDA drawdown since its inception was -93.87%, which is greater than MPWR's maximum drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQDA and MPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQDA | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.87% | -72.27% | -21.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.66% | -22.45% | -13.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.80% | -51.65% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -55.36% | -51.65% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -51.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -22.28% | +22.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.22% | -17.70% | -51.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.69% | 8.80% | +4.89% |
Volatility
LQDA vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Liquidia Corporation (LQDA) is 19.80%, while Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) has a volatility of 25.17%. This indicates that LQDA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MPWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQDA | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.80% | 25.17% | -5.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.80% | 41.34% | +7.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.12% | 50.99% | +15.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.75% | 54.10% | +19.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.67% | 47.52% | +38.15% |
Dividends
LQDA vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison
LQDA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MPWR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQDA Liquidia Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.51% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
LQDA vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Liquidia Corporation and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LQDA vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison
LQDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a gross profit of 132.09M and revenue of 132.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 99.4%.
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
LQDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported an operating income of 61.50M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 46.3%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
LQDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Liquidia Corporation reported a net income of 52.86M and revenue of 132.87M, resulting in a net margin of 39.8%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LQDA and MPWR have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MPWR has higher volatility (25.17%) compared to LQDA (19.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LQDA dropped -93.87% vs MPWR's -72.27%.
LQDA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (7.81 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LQDA and MPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer