LQD vs. QCON
LQD (iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF) and QCON (American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. LQD is passively managed, while QCON is actively managed. LQD charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for QCON.
Performance
LQD vs. QCON - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LQD
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 0.46%
- 6M
- -0.03%
- 1Y
- 6.08%
- 3Y*
- 4.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- 2.52%
QCON
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LQD vs. QCON - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | -0.25% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LQD vs. QCON — Risk / Return Rank
LQD
QCON
LQD vs. QCON - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) and American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF (QCON). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LQD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.23 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LQD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | — | — |
Drawdowns
LQD vs. QCON - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LQD drawdown since its inception was -24.95%, which is greater than QCON's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LQD and QCON.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LQD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.95% | 0.00% | -24.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.34% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.95% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.95% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.72% | 0.00% | -3.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.99% | 0.00% | -3.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | — | — |
Volatility
LQD vs. QCON - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LQD | QCON | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.65% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.90% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.36% | 0.00% | +5.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.65% | 0.00% | +8.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.68% | 0.00% | +8.68% |
LQD vs. QCON - Expense Ratio Comparison
LQD has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than QCON's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
LQD vs. QCON - Dividend Comparison
LQD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, while QCON has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LQD iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 4.57% | 4.48% | 4.45% | 3.99% | 3.30% | 2.30% | 2.66% | 3.29% | 3.67% | 3.10% | 3.34% | 3.47% |
QCON American Century Quality Convertible Securities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, LQD is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LQD is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QCON.
LQD has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 0.00% for QCON.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for LQD and 0.32% for QCON.
Find the right allocation for LQD and QCON
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer